I dreamt Peter got stunned walking into a Klitschko jab

Dude there is way better stuff to discuss...do you want to claim you "made me" because you didn't think what you thought was a joke was funny.

:rofl

 

It's completely true, why would I refute it.

I wish you would have responded though when I summed up my feelings on both WLAD and Peter. You called me a Peter hugger and WLAD hater. My honest statements clarified my position. You should have retracted your comments at that point, in fairness. Unless you are unwilling to be fair with someone who does not look favorably upon WLAD.

 

I don't have a problem. And, you'll be overjoyed to learn, neither do you.

(Unless you consider your exposure a problem)

I am merely pointing out that IntentionalButt has now 'made' you as well.

The bulk of your recent postings confirm his assessment of your status as a Peterite (using your parlance here) and a Klit-hater.

You seem to be somewhat in denial regarding these two facets of your condition. Perhaps this is because you think these are BAD things, to be kept secret like some nasty, antisocial habit.

I am here to tell you that both are ok. We all have our takes and biases, some more than others.

Some posters post widely on all kinds of topics and subject. Others tend to obsess more narrowly. Nothing wrong with that.

Denial, however, gets in the way of self-realization and progress in understanding your true self.

The first step needed in dealing with the situation is admission of the situation. In this regard, getting 'made' is a good and positive thing.

You don't have to worry or pretend any longer.

So much easier and beneficial when all our cards are on the table.

Ask Presscott.

I understand he even runs a support group of some kind now, paying something back, he calls it.

 

what a dream...do you dream he's your man too?:yep :yep

 

You re a liar, Cuchulain...

I gave my fellings on Peter...which means I am clearly not a Peter-ite...You just keep ignoring every part of my posts that proves you wrong. What more do I have to say about Sam.

KLIT-ites are never able to speak about weaknesses of a KLIT...you prove yourself to be a fool.

 

Well let's clarify...when I said Peter is improving at the highest level...I meant he is still improving while he is in the uppper echeleon of the division.

As far as Wlad, if that is your definition of Hater, than to you I definitely am one...all I would add, is that when most on this board that do accuse me of being a hater do so, they are implying that I won't see anything postive and am commited to my previously formed opinion regaurding him.

If he grew a pair, I would become a fan.

 

A liar ?

Those are harsh words, harsh words indeed. And to one who is only interested here in bringing you to a more fulfilling state of self-realization.

Please elucidate with specificity the location and nature of the alleged untruths, so that I might see and examine them for myself.

I shall await.

 

This won't take long.

 

Now what's wrong with this dialogue...???...for starters my post was first, you quoted me, and then typed the above quote.

To tell the lies you told, you had to completely ignore my words. Well done.

 

You have in your signture:

This content is protected

I infer from that that you term Klitschko fans Klit-ites. using the same parlance, you would then, as a fan of Peter, be termed a Peter-ite.
Nothing to be ashamed of there (unless, perhaps, an unstated and suppressed shame at being a fan of one so limited)

You have coined a term Klit- ite and you have pigeon-holed Klitschko fans in there, but you have trouble with the reverse situation regarding Sam.

And it is most evident, as IB has pointed out, that you are what most would term a Klit -hater. The evidence has already been provided by IB, citing your own words.

I come back to the theme of denial. I start to believe that the denial is so deep as to prove unshakeable.

Since there is nothing wrong with either state (Peter-ite or Klit-hater), you must not resist the exposure.

in the end, you will be better for the new self-awareness.

 

Again you use that strong term: lies.

Most offensive and most unnecessary.

The only evidence you provide is Your own denial that you are what was claimed.

And since you appear to be in a state of denial regarding your true condition, this denial simply doesn't hold up.

As IB has already pointed out to you, using your own, less guarded words, you qualify as both a peter-ite and a Klit-hater.

As I have mentioned, there is nothing wrong with this, so long as you are aware of it.

And that self awareness is what I am attempting to draw out of your depths.

 

Trying to be funny is not a good enough excuse to justify lying.

IB has a different definition of hater than you, so your better off not even making reference to it.

I admit to Peter's faults, I admit to WLAD's strengths. That alone disqualifies me from "-ite" status, and hater status.

You're being too much of a baby over my signature. All that makes reference to is the kind of conversation I'm having with you.

Hence, I am still rehabbin' KLIT-ites...you are a tough case though.
There is already a poster going by Doctor Phil, and I am already rehabbin' KLIT-ites.

Borrow someone else's schtick...