Although Kessler has the head to head win, I find it hard to separate the two, in my opinion Kessler wasted a lot of time on pointless fights when he could have added some decent wins.
Froch fairly easily IMO That Bute win put him over. Along with other good wins like Pascal, Johnson, Magee, Taylor, Dirrell, Abraham. Helluva resume.
Based on what? Kessler's best win is Froch, Green, Andrade Froch has Pascal, Bute, Abraham, Johnson, Dirrell
Neither is an atg super middleweight? You smoking crack, they are both probably top 5 in that division
Great resume for Froch but I still think Kessler is a better fighter. Beyer, Sartison, Lucas, Mundine you didn't mention. :bbb
Super close. Good argument either way. Kessler did beat him H2H at a time where Froch was far closer to his prime.
A past prime Kessler beat a prime Froch. Beat him at his own game, too. I don't think anyone can deny that Froch has the better resume. I think that Kessler is clearly a better fighter in the H2H sense. It depends on which one is more important to you when you weigh up your ATG lists; resume or H2H. For me they about break even.
neither will make ATG on their current trajectories. Not unless they up the ante considerably in the few years left them. As far as ranking goes, Froch marginally higher. H2h, kessler beat him yesteryear but the order may have changed this year.
Kessler beat Froch, you guys saying Froch is above kessler know that right? Having Froch above Kessler is like having Froch above Ward