Froch v Burns in Resume and P4P?

i agree with those comparisions the only difference is everyone expected Haye to win all those the only one of Burns list everyone expected him to win was Moses

 

Froch is top 10 P4P and undisputed P4P number 1 in Britain. Not even Haye comes to close to Froch /Thread

 

If it is a 'P4P' list, then you have to factor in that Haye is fighting people that are much bigger than him physically.

 

There will be no other cruiser-weight in our life times, that moves up to heavyweight and captures the heavyweight title none! In a era of superheavyweights, David Haye is a old school heavyweight surviving and he was the catalysis that has ignited the Heavyweight division once again. If pound for pound rankings are based on pure ability and talented, David Haye is the number 1 British fighter by a mile, he's fighting guys who out weigh in by 2-3 stone on average. Carl Froch would be murdered up at CW, and the funny thing is..? David Haye could probably drain himself out, and call Carl Froch out at a catchweight of 190 pounds, and probably sparked him out within 1-3 rounds.

Note: Pound for Pound rankings are ****, nobody cares about them. And they mean absolutely nothing....

 

I like Haye but still think that statement's a bit off the mark PK.

 

what the hell is your point? froch is the best in britain bar none.

 

ye tbf thats true, but i dont think hes proved himself enough to warrant a no.2 spot

 

anyone with eyes (or even one eye) knows it does1

 

Haye won a version of the title against the worst Champion at the time. He was not THE Heavyweight Champ PK.

 

Cruiserweight is a ****ing **** division.