Pacquaio would knock Mayweather out.

Styles make fights. Marquez footwork, familiarity and durability, combined with his physical stature will always make a difficult fight until his legs are gone.

Bradley is highly underrated. He has one of the best aggressive defenses in the sport and is highly versatile.

His negative is his punching mechanics.

But I have not seen any fighter look good against Bradley, but I have seen one fighter beat him, and clearly, despite what the judges scorecard may suggest.

 

Marquez has no bearing on a Mayweather fight.

A bump would be irrelevant.

I do not go along with "group think."

 

This is a very linear argument.

I would suggest you familiarize yourself with Bogotozo's very thoroughly written thread and educated yourself on the differences between each fighter.

You will learn something about the sport.

 

Guzman could have potentially been a more difficult fight than Mayweather.

Guzman is smaller or just as small as Pacquaio. He would have an easier time ducking under Pacquaio's punches.

And if you suggested Pacquaio ducked Guzman or his management did, perhaps you're right. That's a very risky fight.

 

Did you or did you not say that Mayweather was going to walk Cotto down and stop him?

End of argument.

 

You are already confused about the sport.

You were stating that Mayweather would walk down Cotto when it is widely known by educated posters that Cotto has an excellent jab, and that type of gameplan would work in Cotto's favor.

Mayweather's best option was to box Cotto, and to force him to be the aggressor.

 

Again, please read Bogotozo's thread on this for clarification.

This does not merit re-discussion. This has been discussed in length.