Seven years since he's beaten Byrd in their rematch and he STILL hasn't managed to fight the #2 rated HW in the world. P A T H E T I C .
yeah, very pathetic, just one of the longest reining champs of all time. Even if he would get a time machine and KO Ali and Tyson you'll call Ali and Tyson bums and nobodys just to support your argument.
let be honest, you can become an ATG by longevity and that is what Wlad is going for. He did not have the fighters around him to get their through beating other Elite HWs and to be frank I think he would have lost to a Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, Holmes level fighter
Chisora lost every time he stepped up. Why would the Champion fight this bum? I remember when the fight was announced these message boards were screaming how pathetic it is that Wlad is supposed to fight the bum Chisora. And now apparently he is ducking this piece of ****.
Vitali, when he was the #1 ranked HW in the world, after Lewis retired, beat the consensus #2 ranked HW in the world - and as such can lay claim to the legitimate HW title. Wlad, OTOH, as the #1 ranked HW in the world, has never beaten the consensus #2 ranked HW. NEVER. So, to answer your question; Yes, I see a difference... Vitali > Wlad
No man I think you where done the minute you brought Derick Chisora into the argument. Next you'll prob be claiming Haye destroyed a man Wlad ducked. Byrd, was the 2nd/3rd best fighter when Lewis was around yet Lewis never fought him. Wlads resume is solid, yes he doesn't have a Holyfield on his resume, but he has dominated a division like no other fighter since Louis and Ali.
Do you think it doesnt hurt him that he never faced ATG heavyweight, and Wlad is unlucky that second best fighter in his time as champion is his brother so he didnt clean the division its not his fault but its unlucky:good