I say yes because the styles fit perfectly for Hamed. But pacquiao is still the better fighter by far.
yup, he could've probably even KO'ed ironchined guys like morales. hamed is also very vulnerable on the other hand.
Hell yeah he did besides Hearns, but that wasn't the same Duran and didn't even train for that fight. But at 130 he was the best wish he fought Pyror since both were promoted by Don King
Naw he only thorw one punch at a time but he has the power to it though but i dont see Hamed winning.
YES and if he caught Marquez and knocked him down...he wouldnt let him off the hook like Manny. Hamed was a brutal finisher. Manny is busy like a bee.
Hamed was knocked down and back up what? 2 seconds? Hamed hits the floor because hes off balance, i never saw Hamed down for more than 2 seconds in his entire career.
There is simply no way to compare the power of these two. To put it in a better perspective, Pac was able to KO or KD future hall of famer fighters that previously had never had been KDed or KOed before. In fact, KDing JMM 4 times speaks a lot because only MAB had KDed JMM. These guys have proven chins that when fighting them, you probably could win by decision only (like th jmm vs. MAB fight). it is also not power alone that would determine the outcome of the fight. It also has something to do with how well you can absorb a punch. Hamed had fought very well at 126 but his level of opposition at that time is nowhere the caliber of JMM, MAB, or Morales. I respect Hamed as a fighter because he brings a lot of extra things in the ring (ring entrance, the walk, the bravado, etc), but there is no way of knowing how he will fare against Pac.