Do you think the heavyweight contenders in this era are good?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dai, Nov 10, 2012.


  1. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    If we had good contenders now, guys like Briggs, Rahman and even Holyfield would not be given second, third and fourth go rounds.
     
  2. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    Terrible era for contenders. Not sure why people keep posing the same question. It really is a no-brainer.
     
  3. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    that's basically it

    Waits for klitschko hardcore fans to proclaim "briggs was younger than vitali so that makes it ok"
     
  4. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,444
    1,205
    Jul 19, 2004
    Been watching boxing since the EARLY 80's and I have seen all you can from the past eras..

    THIS ERA IS GARBAGE!!!
     
  5. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,059
    Oct 25, 2006
    It's pretty poor.

    The Klitschko's have been head and shoulders above the competition and have maintained a standard at least, but if you look at the contenders, they have been largely very poor.

    There is just no getting around it. Even the mostly disinterested, poorly conditioned heavyweights of the 80's like Page, Witherspoon and Thomas were skillful fighters, who on their day could be trouble for anyone. They had great amateur pedigrees and could fight.

    A mostly forgotten heavyweight like Tyrell Biggs would have people frothing at the mouth today, compared to the likes of Thompson, Chisora, Wach etc.

    It's not a knock on the Klitschko's, but it's a knock on this era as a whole.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    Povetkin, Adamek, Chambers, Haye, Vitali, these guys would all be rated contenders in most eras. Wlad himself is a worthy champion who I'd favour over most past champions.

    The division is fine talent wise, it's just that the contenders don't seem to be fighting each other.
     
  7. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    5
    Mar 4, 2006
    the post Lewis era is awful

    There are 3 elite HW's right now in the World, the Klits and Haye and none are proper ATG's like Lewis, they aren't on that level.

    No one else right now is anything other than decent (although hopefully some of the promising ones come through)

    As for Wach, he is no average title challenger, he'd be nothing in past era's, that is an insult to past average title holders to call him an average title holder.
     
  8. locard

    locard Boxing Addict banned

    4,937
    9
    Nov 6, 2011
    better than in Larry Holmes era at least
     
  9. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,153
    Apr 4, 2012
    I remember the 70's 80's 90's and 00's. This era is only indifferent for US based fighters. The US scene is almost identical to the 80's before Tyson. It lacks a real US presence.
     
  10. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    To skew the results. This is a thread for haters, and it's best ignored as such. Let the Brittards weep bitterly.
     
  11. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007
    Deluded people don't want to hear this they prefer the eras with such greats as Vaughn Bean, Axel Schulz, Mavrovic, grandad Foreman, Botha, Morrison and Michael Grant and Phil Jackson, oh and not to mention Akinwande.

    Great times with selective memory.
     
  12. Wegner

    Wegner Guest

    There can be no doubt that had Wach been born in one of the weak eras, like the 80s, he would have been talked of as an ATG and would be a champion. He still could be a champion! Don't let this loss fool you.