How many rounds has Wlad actually lost in his Pro career? Surely he must be the most dominant heavyweight in history? I know he got knocked out 3 times earlier in his career but even in these fights he hardly lost a round (The Sanders fight only last 2 rounds). Even when Peter Dropped him a few times he still won to show how much he'd dominated most of the rounds. In his 13/14 fights as world heavyweight champion he has only lost 2/3 rounds in my opinion.
To make a mark in the history books as being "dominant", it would have be dependant on who he dominated. He's a decent enough fighter, but the opposition has been ****ing lousy in all honesty.
So people don't think because of his size and physical advantages he has taken heavyweight boxing to a new level? Ali, Tyson, Frazier, Foreman etc wouldn't of been big enough to beat Wlad in my opinion.
I think the Foreman that destroyed Frazier would have beat Wlad quite easily. Ali obviously would beat him, not sure if Tyson could get to Wlad.
I'm really tired of this argument If that's what you think then fine, live in ignorance, it really is too stupid a viewpoint to argue with. How did "little holyfield" beat Bowe? [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ooarvj6f_k[/ame] WITH CLASS
come on you know full well, it was a massive fight that was hyped up probably beyond the heights it could reach, sure the fight was a bit of a let down but we'd all watch a rematch Jean-Marc Mormeck
How can he be the most dominant champion in history when there is another dominant champion fighting at the same time?
