Seth Mitchell vs Johnathan Banks

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jcairns1, Nov 14, 2012.


  1. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    If he does HBO will start hyping him up like crazy. Michael Grant II waiting to happen.
     
  2. millertime1367

    millertime1367 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,777
    1
    Sep 11, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om0DhDKPFho[/ame]

    looking forward to this fight.....50/50 for me...Banks is the better boxer
     
  3. Porgeous Porge

    Porgeous Porge Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,452
    2
    May 22, 2012
    very valid point, i think Iggy got KO'd before he really got going, and Mitchel was faster and maybe even better

    Witherspoon either thought Mitchell was more done than he really was, just got plain reckless, or because he rarely KO's guys or is on TV he got antsy

    I do think regardless of what Witherspoon did wrong Mitchell's body attack hurt him took wind out of his sails and this immobilized him

    but i think Witherspoon had to fight dumb to allow Mitchell to get to the body
     
  4. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    30
    Jan 29, 2008
    I thought Iggy and Chazz did well for a round, or a round and half. Chazz, obviously, nearly had Mitchell out. Iggy -- despite landing fewer punches -- was connecting nicely with long rights. If both guys had kept the fight at a distance, and avoided trading bombs with Mitchell, who knows what might have happened over the long run.

    So why did Iggy and Chazz close the distance and elect to trade with bulldozer like Mitchell?

    At first, I thought Iggy and Chazz -- especially the latter -- got cocky. I blamed them for making tactical mistakes. But in retrospect, I'm wondering if perhaps Mitchell's pressure forced each guy to dig and fight (as opposed to keeping the distance). Maybe they felt they had no breathing room, and needed to get respect. I don't know.

    Maybe Mitchell is that fast on his feet, in pursuit of long-range fighters. Whatever the case, when he gets close enough, he unloads brutal body combos mixed with overhand rights to the head. It's lights out at that point.

    Nobody should trade punches with Mitchell. The key to beating him is to score well from long range -- especially with rights to the head. I doubt Banks can do this.
     
  5. Boxingfan2

    Boxingfan2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,868
    3,227
    Mar 11, 2012
    I think mitchell will take it, he will corner Banks at some point and take him out.
     
  6. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    7,875
    13
    Mar 28, 2012
    Good fight nice to see some more American heavies.
     
  7. T.S.

    T.S. T.Stout Full Member

    5,959
    114
    Jul 23, 2004
    Boy I was I wrong :patsch I knew Banks had the experience to expose Mitchell I am suprised at how easily he destroyed him :good
     
  8. T.S.

    T.S. T.Stout Full Member

    5,959
    114
    Jul 23, 2004
    It sure did! He wasn't about to let Emanuel down :good
     
  9. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    30
    Jan 29, 2008
    I always knew that Mitchell would come to this end: no defense, question chin. However I didn't a Banks type-of-opponent would get the job done. I guess the secret to beating Mitchell is to have a little pop in the right, and to beat him to the punch.
     
  10. T.S.

    T.S. T.Stout Full Member

    5,959
    114
    Jul 23, 2004
    Way to show off some boxing skills with some nice back pedaling :good :bbb