Is Rosario underrated?...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TheSouthpaw, Nov 25, 2012.


  1. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Touugh, good gritty smart fighter spending his entire career makin sure all his fights win or lose were a sight to see, One of the slickest guys Ive ever seen. And if you are A Rosario fan his fight with Chavez is hard to watch. But in my opinion Rosario is underrated, and I believe he was full
    of talent with alot of heart, who just happened to be a vicious puncher.
     
  2. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    Overrated IMO, hes in the IBHOF while Curry, Nunn and Hamed arent? They were held in a much higher regard during thier peaks and are straight up better fighters.
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    The one thing which Rosario showed which Curry ,Nunn and Hamed did not is perseverance. After Ramirez he could have declined like they did, but he didn't just come back he almost beat Hector and then did beat Bramble easily. Fought Chavez, won the lightweight title again against I think Nazario, and then later beat Garza at 140. To me he brushed off his loses better than those guys and his wins were devastating. Not that Curry vs. Mccrory and Nunn vs. Kalambay were not good but Rosario was always a possibility to win by knockout in any fight.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    one last comment. His fight with Bramble was incredible. Bramble was a 4-1 favorite and Rosario slowly took over the fight in 2 rounds. When I mean slowly, you could see Bramble not being as aggressive as the first round went on and Rosario would counter with the left any Bramble threw a punch. The speed of Rosario was too much and even his jab started to land. Then when round 2 came Rosario started to slip Bramble jab and bend to his left to position himself to land his left uppercut on Bramble, whom Rosario said was too straight up to beat him. And that left uppercut started the punches landing on Bramble. I remember it was a left uppercut which Rosario landed on Bramble on the ropes and then Rosario knew he could hurt him and he just counterpunched and had Bramble backing up. Once he hurt him with that uppercut on the ropes it was just a minute until he stopped him with numerous punches. One of the best 2 round demolisions I have seen as well as Hearns vs. Duran. It was apparent after this fight that Rosario was underrated and Bramble overrated. It was that clean a win.
     
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    Rosario got beaten senseless and stopped on his feet too much for him to ever be underrated. He was what he was and that's how he's been fairly evaluated for the most part.
     
  6. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Held his own with Randall, Camacho, Ramirez, Davis and beat the **** out of Bramble, Viruet, Jones, Nazario and Garza.

    I think most would admit he's fairly fortunate to be in the HOF, but hey if Barry McGuigan and Brian Mitchell are in...
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    El Chapo was really "on" for that Bramble fight. It was his high water mark. Very impressive. I think he was just fortunate not to have been around in Duran's reign as lightweight champ. If they met, it would have turned out to be one of those affairs with the ref mercifully rescueing a helpless Rosario hanging on the ropes taking barrage after barrage from Duran, ala the Ramirez fight. Duran would have been waaay too much for him, as would, in a totally different way, Ken Buchanan.
     
  8. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    24,426
    10,142
    Jun 23, 2008
    Hamed was NOT better than Rosario.
     
  9. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,803
    11,440
    Aug 22, 2004
    I think if anything, he's probably overrated a bit. He could KO just about anyone he hit solidly, but he depended on that one punch to bail him out too many times. He got that "Puncher's Disease." And when he was hurt, he just completely unravelled. Had no idea at all how to hold, and couldn't recover quickly. He was a lot like Frank Bruno in that way, but at least Bruno learned to hold by the time he fought McCall. In essence, if you hurt him at all, he was done.

    He looked as good as he did against Bramble because Bramble foolishly believed his own press, that his chin was impregnable. He called it his "coconut," and he essentially invited Rosario to try it out. Less than two rounds in, he was clubbed to his haunches saying to himself, "Oh hey, look, the floor!"
     
  10. Hammer Muldoon

    Hammer Muldoon Active Member Full Member

    1,252
    6
    Nov 27, 2010
    Excellent fighter, sits just a level below the very best fighters at lightweight imo. I had him winning the Camacho fight, would have been interesting to see how he would be rated had he got the decision.
     
  11. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,580
    7,220
    Aug 17, 2011
    If it were somehow possible for Rosario to have never realized how hard he hit, I think it would have made him a better fighter.
     
  12. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    Yeah i would say he was, people just extremely hate hamed and that causes him to get underrated. I have hamed clearly above rosario on my all time list and that wont be changing anytime soon.
     
  13. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Hamed WAS not a better fighter..Period
     
  14. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012

    I agree, he had some power
     
  15. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,425
    11,889
    Mar 19, 2012
    Its depends on the perspective. There were some pretty high expectations for Rosario early on. I believe some referred to him as the Duran of the 80s.

    His talent was evident. I guess his inconsistancey was the biggest thing that cost him ATG status. He had some nice wins.

    Correct me if im wrong but didnt he past his prime win a 140lb belt? I thought he beat Garza in Sac. Not sure though.