dwyer reaches another low he thinks hatton was winning and is still world class

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by IRONSENSE2002, Nov 25, 2012.


  1. IRONSENSE2002

    IRONSENSE2002 muslim and proud Full Member

    5,383
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    what a ****ing loon. to think this guy genuinely has paying subscribers who he offers gambling advice to.
    This content is protected

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-oGTdAzjOA&list=FLBcFoQPB7137UekX118Db0A&index=3&feature=plcp[/ame]
     
  2. Jed Maxwell

    Jed Maxwell Member Full Member

    225
    0
    Aug 23, 2012
    who the hell is this ****. 1 minute in and im getting suicidal tendencies.
     
  3. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I thought he made a lot of valid points
     
  4. wallworkjake123

    wallworkjake123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,188
    9
    Jul 20, 2011
  5. bruthead

    bruthead REAL TALK Full Member

    2,308
    1
    May 3, 2009
    Dwyer is sort of right that Ricky looked okay for a few rounds; it's just that Ricky has no business being in the ring any more.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,155
    85,036
    Nov 30, 2006
    He was most certainly winning. You can't really argue for a card in Senchenko's favor when he clearly lost four (five on mine) in a row.
     
  7. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    Hatton and everyone involved at Primetime, "He was 5 rounds up".

    Just LMFAO. Seriously this is worse than HBO for the Pacquiao-Bradley fight.

    This bias **** does my f*cking head in. All it is, is promotion of "their fighter".

    Anybody who knows **** about boxing, knows, f*cking KNOWS, Senchenko was 2 rounds up. He was out boxing Hatton behind a very good jab, Hatton was coming in like a raging boner, and getting tagged multiple times on the way in. Hatton was showing his frustration, and started to miss even more wildly than he did earlier in the fight.

    Ring rust played a part, but he was missing all fight, I gave Hatton a couple of the early rounds, where neither fighter really did much, Hatton didn't land much in the early rounds, but he was pressing more, and Senchenko didn't offer much.

    But after about the 4th onwards, Senchenko was taking the rounds, one after the other. I had it 77-75 Senchenko, before the knockdown. And that was calling the fight down the middle and calling it how a fight is supposed to be called.

    Even the ref started to help Ricky in certain parts of the fight, like when they both fell over one another, and Ricky got up tired and slow, so the ref pulled him over to the corner, and the corner man CUT OFF tape from his glove.....no tape was hanging.

    ....but it meant f*ck all, he was finished in the next round anyway.

    Hatton was wild, and paid for it with a cracking body shot, that even Hatton admitted he knew he was looking for all fight.

    Same old Hatton then....."knew about it"....but did f*ck all to adjust in the ring! He never has and never will, always was a 1 gear fighter, credit to the man for getting in shape and sorting his life out, but don't touch the game anymore! The game don't need you, and you don't need the game Ricky!

    This dog never learned new tricks, he never will. Wise of him to retire for good now, before he gets seriously hurt.

    Someone better than Senchenko, would have murdered him when Ricky was walking in, no head movement, and taking shots like that.

    I dread to think if it was against a fighter with power and timing. Could have been Manny Pacquiao all over again.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,155
    85,036
    Nov 30, 2006
    ^ tl;dr - Senchenko lost 1-5 clearly. :hi: 1-4 if you want to niggle. (although Hatton's workrate did still edge him the fifth in my view; Senchenko was already in rhythm but not yet doing enough)
     
  9. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    I gave Ricky a couple of rounds, I haven't got my card next to me, TBH, I think I chucked it in the bin. But If I remember rightly, I gave Ricky a couple of the early rounds and maybe one later on. But I had Senchenko up 77-75, the round before the finish.

    I don't know how people can score rounds for a fighter that was missing 80% of his shots, and the shots he did land, were nout special. Senchenko wasn't landing out special, until the final punch, but he was landing, where Ricky was missing.

    This is boxing and when you score fights, you score on whats landing.

    HOWEVER, if Ricky was pressing the fight and missing **** loads, but there was nothing coming back from the other fighter, then I suppose you have to score the round for Ricky. But Senchenko was boxing, and boxing very nicely I must add!
     
  10. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    5
    Mar 4, 2006
    I had it 4-4 but have no issue with anyone who had Hatton ahead
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    Same as, 4-4 but Ricky could've been 5-3 up going into the 9th. Hardly Conteh-Burnett-esque showing.
     
  12. zxcvbnm

    zxcvbnm #TeamHWFuture Full Member

    4,245
    4
    May 29, 2010
    Let's just say it was close, shall we? Anyone who had it more than two rounds either way at the time of the stoppage, DKSAB.
     
  13. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    i think it was the 7th round that i counted 20 unanswered punches all connected for senchenko....but because of hattons walking forward aggressive moves it was almost camouflaged......if that makes sense
     
  14. jimmycee

    jimmycee New Member Full Member

    52
    0
    Oct 11, 2012
    what the fk does it matter who was up on the cards, he got stopped, its over.
    theres no bigger hatton fan than myself, and i admittedly got carried away with the ''hatton revival''. he was never going to come back so long after his last fight, i believe he could have made a come back but that was straight after the pacman loss. truth is it was always going to end that way, if not in that fight it would have been the next.
    hatton of old would have steamrolled that fool. there was no timing, head movement, or footwork. against malignaggi his foot work was spot on, constantly in and out of the pocket and keeping his man off balance. to do this you have to have fitness, which after so long out that conditioning wasnt there.
    in my eyes ricky will always be a british boxing legend. before you say it, no he wasnt the most gifted fighter. but to become a legend you need the heart, the courage, the personality, the public appeal, hatton had these in abundance. it was great to feel the hairs stand up on the back of my neck as blue moon sounded around the arena. nobody in boxing gives me that kind of buzz anymore. boxing wont be the same without the manc mexican.
    big up the hitman.
     
  15. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    its amazing so many people saying "he was never going to do it" now...but when the fight was announced it was very rare to find people saying he'd lose