I've scored the Pacquiao/Marquez Trilogy in Rounds .....

Not really.

 

I'm sure you were watching it while zipping on a nice cup of your warm pee .

 

Not to mention the fact that JMM went down 4 times and wasn't ever broken. I think that says more about JMM than it does about Pac. You can get lucky and land a perfect shot but you can't teach or ever put a price on the will to survive and fight back. Not to take anything away from Pac's abilities; I just think Marquez's resiliency is more impressive than the knockdowns. Nobody ever gives JMM enough credit for it.

 

Next week it will be 35 to 13

 

23-13 is what I have too. Seems that would be more agreeable to the consensus than would be, say, 18-18.

 

Just watched their third fight. Had it 114-114. So many rounds that could've gone either way.

 

Juan is better than Manny H2H no denying it.

 

Visual perspective is crucial in close rounds. This trilogy is exciting to me cause i might give to different fighters at different times.

Both are highly skilled professionals so im fine just enjoying the fight itself. For the rec, i give marquez fights 1 and 3 and pac fight 2.

 

But some rounds ware like 10:7 10:8 for PAC which if you score
by points it should be officially more like a draw, at least half of the rounds
were very close and a personal taste (not based on real boxing knowledge)
is important in scoring to left or to right.

My personal taste is that a more offensive than defensive
fighter should win, hence PAC pressing and initiating the attack
is better than Maruez' passive/counter punching style
which more destroys action than initiate anything.

I think most judges see this the same way, that is why PAC is officially a clear winner.

 

But they fought 3 times and Marquez lost all three . Oh we get it...Marquez got robbed .