Kelly Pavlik vs Carl Froch at 168 who takes it?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Dec 12, 2012.


  1. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Surprised at the voting since Pavlik destroys guys who fight him. Beat Taylor better than Froch did. Although Froch seems to be peaking and Pavliks declining.
     
  2. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    Triangle theory, really? That's Max Kellerman logic.

    Jermaine Taylor beat Hopkins.

    Lucian Bute beat Glen Johnson and Brian McGee much easier then carl froch did and look what Froch did to him.

    I like Kelly Pavlik and cannot stand Carl, but Froch wins this fight it any time in Pavlik's career.
     
  3. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Not trilogy but a comparison of where each fighter is at. I disagree. A focused Pavlik is more than a live dog in this match up.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,155
    85,033
    Nov 30, 2006
    Froch by British stoppage, after bloodying Pavlik up.
     
  5. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,872
    29,789
    Sep 19, 2012
    I think Pavlik is more skilled than Froch and could outbox him, Pavlik is also tough and would trade with Froch, this would not be one sided but I would favor Froch to win probably by decision.
     
  6. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    I really like both these guys and this fight would be a war for the first 6 rounds and then Froch would start imposing himself and go onto a late stoppage or UD.
     
  7. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,737
    3,840
    Oct 30, 2011
    Pavlik does everything Froch does, but better. Pavlik by KO. :[
     
  8. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    Froch late KO, Froch 2nd or 3rd at SMW against a drunk shot guy who has never achieved anything above 160, you either insanely bias or ad too much meth if you think pavlik.
     
  9. Wordup

    Wordup Big Stiff Idiot Full Member

    1,644
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    There's only 1 thing Pavlik does better that Froch and that's drink!
     
  10. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,480
    1,738
    Nov 20, 2007
    This before Kessler removes the Polish parts off Froch's face or after?
     
  11. D_Andrade

    D_Andrade Guest

    Froch doesn't have the ch!n for this fight Pavlik stops him brutally!
     
  12. VIP

    VIP Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,175
    2
    Aug 19, 2004
    Froch easy win...probably by KO.

    Pavlik would have had a chance a few years ago.
     
  13. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,737
    3,840
    Oct 30, 2011
    Only seen Froch against boxers besides Abraham.. never seen him against someone who hits harder than him/same style/taller/better chin. Pavlik by brutal KO. :[
     
  14. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009
    Not sure if half these posts are serious. What has Pavlik done in the last few years tro suggest he'd even win a round against Froch ?

    Froch would beat him up, possibly stop him.
     
  15. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,737
    3,840
    Oct 30, 2011
    What has Froch done in the past few years to overrate him this highly? Pavlik lost against 2 boxers, never been stopped, and when he got knocked down he got right back up and stopped the other guy.. the only time Froch boxed was against the midget Abraham. He knocked out china chinned Bute, got embarrassed by Ward, lost to Kessler, embarrassed and got a gift to Dirrel.. only win I give Froch credit to is Pascal. What warrants Froch to knock Pavlik out or outbox the taller and stronger Pavlik under a new trainer?