http://rt.com/sport/boxing/vitali-klitschko-haye-lies-682/ After reading this article i doubt the fight will happen, Vitalis saying hes not thinking of Haye, i think maybe he will retire and go into his political career
Didn't think you could duck somebody who is unwilling to get into the ring, regardless of what Haye says as he is a proven habitual bullshitter.
A career high pay day and a fight most fans want to see which he would be a big favourite and he is gong to walk away from it. You have to wonder if Vitali is intrested in leaving any legacy at all.
atsch Vitali said he'd fight the winner of Haye/Chisora. Fought Charr instead. I'll believe the word of the salesman over the scumbag politician.
how is it possible to duck someone who twice refused to fight in the past and is now calling you out because he has waited for you to age badly?
At this point Vittles can do whatever the hell he wants to. He's under no obligation to fight Haye, and it won't affect his legacy in the slightest if he refuses to do so. Course, it'd be nice if he does so and wins, but at this stage Vit's legacy is more or less complete. It's not as strong as it could have been, especially compared to Wlad's, but it doesn't need any extra embellishing either.
Haye has ducked Vitali multiple times, so he had his chance and 15 minutes of fame. Why should Vitali face Haye? Because Haye talk a lot and se himself as a god, so he could get another big payday, and blame his other toes?
Please tell me how many times has Haye gone back on his word to fight Vitali? Haye only started mentioning Vitali when Vitali mentioned his possible retirement. Vitali doesn't owe Haye anything, Haye isn't his mandatory and he should have taken the fight instead of pulling out to fight Valuev.
To answer OPs questions: no & very little. What's official is that the pair Haye lost fighting Wlad is still missing :yep However the toe seems to be in good health