Did you see a robbery in the scoring of Pacman-JMM II?

:|
:cry:
:crybaby
:crybby

 

Well that's the first time I heard that the judges are all corrupt. Even if it's true that Judges gives benefit of the doubt to a bigger name . . . doesn't mean they are corrupt. The other boxing websites that I've been into . . . says these judges are credible. If you are going to make accusations like that, better be ready to prove it. :think

Again . . . a sign of desperation man.

Yeah the polls . . . didn't you read my post regarding your polls? These polls . . . shows the general consensus of the posters on different websites . . . but it doesn't necessarilly mean it's correct. I'm sorry . . . because not all these people who knows how to post, knows how to score fights and they don't understand what a "10 point must system is" . . . an ordinary fan who sees a fighter dominate some rounds will always assume he's gonna win but it doesn't work like that. In a 10 round system . . . every round has it's own score that will be tallied at the end of 12 rounds that gives us a winner.

Jesus . . . Divac . . . I'm expecting better from you. It's seems that you lost the right to call other posters here NUTHUGGERS . . . because you've shown your true color that you yourself is a JMM nuthugger. :-(

Let it go . . . it's a lost cause. Check what the poll in this thread says . . . you don't have to go to other websites.

 

I thought it should of been 115-112 in favour of Marquez.

For me JMM landed the cleaner shots throughout

 

clear rounds for jmm : 2,5,6,8,12
clear rounds for pac : 3 [10-8],4,9,10
close rounds : 1,7,11

possible final scores: 115-112 pac (7-5), 114-113 pac (6-6),
113-114 jmm (5-7), 112-115 jmm [4-8]

i certainly wouldn't give all the close rounds to either one of them (but 2 judges actually did) so my best scores for this fight was either 114-113 pac (my actual score) or 113-114 jmm. therefore, once and for all, the fight was very close and there was definitely NO ROBBERY! let's all move on.

 

As I was saying there can't be any robbery in a fight "which can go both ways" . . . it's too close that's all.

:yep

 

definetely not a robbery

 

No robbery. Only Divac saw it as robberty, btw.

 

It's really absurd how some JMMorons can claim that Marquez won 22 out of 24 rounds of the two fights. :rofl

 

No, I saw a close fight that I had Marquez up by a point. And there was a close round or 2, so it wasn't like there were 7 rounds that Marquez won by a clear margin.

 

Where is the option "no, I thought Pac won". ???

 

Did you close your eyes when JMM was knocked down and when he held on to the ropes for dear life? Only clear punches can deliver that, isn't it?

 

no robbery... only cry babies. lol

 

thought it was a very easy fight to score.
Cant remember the fight that well, but it was 1 round JMM 1 round PAC. I tho JMM had a few more early rounds.

 

too close to complain...

 

i really dont see all the noise about this fight...it was close, but to call it a robery would be ridiculous (or atleast based off of my memory of the fight)....if i recall i had pac up 3 rounds