What is the main reason why you rate him this? Options: 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 If he's outside your top 50, I don't care for your pathetic opinion.
Chavez De La Hoya (arguably) Nelson McGirt (x2) Vasquez Ramirez (x2) Considering he could be as high as #1 in terms of ability and skills displayed on film for me, probably somewhere near the bottom of the top 20-25.
Got a pretty strong case for 90s fighter of the decade and is the last Undisputed LW Champ, if that means jack**** to you.
Somewhere inside the top 25. In terms of being the flat out best I've ever seen in boxing, he's probably #4.
im not a big fan of compiling ATG P4P lists but as far as 135-147 goes Robinson Leonard Hearns Whitaker Duran De La Hoya Trinidad Mayweather Marquez Pacquiao Cotto Margarito Tszyu Chavez and before the *****s and *******s chime in with their all mighty butt hurt De La Hoya and Trinidad in their primes would be too big for them, As for Duran-Whitaker its a close call but Duran quit because Leonard was schooling him in the rematch, just imagine the hissy fit vs Whitaker (also never was a big Chavez fan on the technical side of things although prime 4 prime Tszyu-Chavez would be close)
:rofl Well we do, but mostly because I make it that way purposely rather than real conviction or disagreement.