Like Penalty Shot For Boxing: After A Foul, Should Opponents Get 1 Free Shot?

I've been thinking about this all night, i couldn't sleep, sorry if this has been posted before

I've been working on compiling everyone's response in emails 2 the wbc, wbo, wba, ibf and many of the smaller organizations, but I have 1 more q I wanted 2 run by you guys

ive seen a lot of complaints about how fouls have negatively effected the outcome of a fight - see abner mares-africbeko; cotto-judah low blows, sam peters rabbit punnching

and generally I think if the ref catches it - sure it's a good thing2 deduct a point, works fine right?

BUT
I think we've seen in some particularly instances where dirty fouls have completely changed the course of a fight and made it unfair - and it seems even deducting poiints is not enough

So what I propose and will propsoe 2 the organizations in email later today is the 2 begin the debate (obviously not implement) the concept of "free shots"

In hockey if U make a foul U get a penalty shot - 1 free shot against the goalie - nobody complaints about that?

basketball u get free throws - who complains about that?

football u get 2 touchdown tries but u don't see anyone bitching about that

why is boxing different? why not - after a particularly dirty foul - why not consider a scenario where if U are fouled against, the ref stops the action & u get 1 free punch at your opponent & the opponent can't defend

Now I believe this wuld add a great deal of excitement and would clean up the sport at the same time - it would also add strategy because if you are about 2 get punched bc u made a penalty u could also possibly have the ability 2 duck OR bend back n counter

1 thing that I'm not sure of is whether the ref would hold the foulee's hands behand their back during the free shot but I'm still figuring it out

please contribute 2 this thread w/ your thoughts - i am not defensive or married 2 this idea - just want to hear any opinions, whether u support t or just agree with it

thnx 4 your time - please try to get your responses in by 4pm ESt if u think of it - respond here & don't pm me, i get lots of messages

 

no it's okay not offended this is a safe place, i consider u guys on esb some of my best friends and tho the right 2 express opinions may be sacred the process is not sacred - ideas should not be babied we should rip them apart until we get 2 the truth - thnaks 4 your help - i respectfully disagree with u but I am waiting for more opinions

 

jeremy, i think u misunderstand my intensions - i am trying 2 help boxing thru discussion - amplifying truths -

let's cut 2 the chase - boxing is not as popular as it once was in america - boxing is no longer on normal TV, the link 2 boxing coverage is hidden on espn if u try 2 look for it - when is the last time u seen a boxer on a wheaties box

so i am trying something new - rather than complain - i want to explain - i want 2 find ways 2 make boxing more popular than ever - it's with fan feedback and using sociol media 2 get in touch - these r tools never imagined once and now unto us in our hands and use - this is important time if u stop n think about it

i am not interested in quarrel about whether manny pacquiao is strong or how many people floyd mayweather is fight - I am here 2 bring it back to boxing's roots and that is debate which is mental boxing - and boxing is more mental than physical as many have been quoted and though the brain is the most sensual organ in the body it is also the most violant - let's use our brains for boxing 4 once thx

 

This rule plus a referee who penalizes Wlad's holding would be the end of his career imagine Haye landing a free full power shot on Wlad. Hell even Foreman might come out of retirement again