Just How Good Was Pernell Whitaker.?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BootyWarrior, Jan 9, 2013.


  1. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    You could, though I'm comfortable just leaving it at him being the better fighter overall. Floyd's obviously far more strict to technique and based on fundamentals, less of a risk taker. His athleticism and reflexes allowed him to work more flexibly within his style and give him added dimensions most don't have the benefit of. Pernell was something much more undefined, unorthodox and innovative and was tried against better opposition; I think his reflexes, radar and ability to discombulate an opponent's timing were all better even if he got hit more, but that also goes back to his willingness to assume more risks (in the ring fighting, I mean).
     
  2. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Or Azumah Nelson.
     
  3. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,540
    Mar 16, 2008
    I think Mayweather vs Whitaker is a very hard fight to call. Floyd has a brilliant boxing brain and it would be the type of fight where the decision is argued about for years. An absorbing back and forth game of fistic chess.
     
  4. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    I dunno man, boxing has evolved a lot since Whitaker's 'day'. Someone like Rios probably beats the brakes off him. Prime Roy wouldn't be that effective either, fighters are more athletic now.
     
  5. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Floyd beats Pernell via modern nutrition & strength & conditioning
     
  6. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    22
    Dec 12, 2009

    :yep

    Man **** that, Paulie Mallignaggi would box his ears off!
     
  7. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    Would have schooled the sh*t out of Juan Manuel Marquez thrice in the same fight. That's just how good he was.
     
  8. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    You are one of the least knowledgeable posters on this forum.

    In fact, you are a complete idiot.
     
  9. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    This is exactly the way i saw it! the guy was a **** artist, the ring was his canvas. You fought him in the ring you entered his world, one could only imagine how great he would have been if wasnt coked out at the end of his career. I have him around the top ten ATG
     
  10. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Great fighter. One of the biggest talents ever. Had his own style.

    The only problem is his resume. However, many (including me) think he actually defeated JCC.
     
  11. MrGlass

    MrGlass Active Member Full Member

    1,114
    4
    Dec 10, 2010
    He didn't win any of his biggest fights.

    Very good in two weight divisions, 135 & 147.

    But not one of the 35 greatest pound for pound fighters of all time.
     
  12. PivotPunch

    PivotPunch Guest

    :lol:
     
  13. ReturnofTheKing

    ReturnofTheKing Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    I agree slightly I have sweet peaa little higher around top 25 defeated 5 hofers in his career
     
  14. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    Exactly.
     
  15. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    Well, many think (me included) that he was undefeated before the Tito's fight. Depending of course on how you scored his fights against Oscar De La Hoya and Wilfredo Rivera I.