More meaningless stats. Lamar Clark has the most consecutive knockout wins in heavyweight history. Nikolai Valuev is the biggest heavyweight champion ever. Lennox Lewis has beaten every man he ever fought by way of rematch (well ok that actually has some relevance).
I'm failing to see your point. You just posted a bunch of meaningless stats in addition to the one you initially posted. Good thing I chose not to do that in this thread.
If one of the Klitschkos is gonna be in the top ten i think it will be Wlad, Vitali within the top 20 thought sure
Don't forget that Lewis had a really badly broken nose, so that fight should have been stopped and given to Vitali. I think Salido would agree, but unlike Salido, Vitali was beating Lewis on the cards, Lewis was ready to be knocked out. Lewis retired rather than face Vitali again, he turned down his biggest payday. Vitali staggered Lewis, Lewis punches never hurt Vitali, but the lacing, rubbing of his hair, etc., helped Lewis. Vitali would still fight Lewis right now, but watch Lewis run................. Vitali and Vlad would beat any fighter living today, in any weight division, including Ward and Mayweather. Hey, if Ward or Mayweather is the best fighter in the world, then they should back it up by fighting Vitali or Vlad. Klitschkos beat "all" fighters period. You can't say that about anyone else.
Mayweather? atsch he is a foot shorter than vitali That uppercut had vitali holding on and if they beat all fighters how come Lewis smashed Vitali's face in and Saunders wiped Wlad out They were fighters As you are a fan. Is vitali turning down his biggest payday by ducking haye?
With 30 first round KOs Briggs actually ranks "only" second or third. One place above Dempsey. But in hw history he has the most.
I don't even think it does. It's just the result of a incredible coincidence and luck (of getting his opponents back in the ring with him). A freak stat, just like Shannon Briggs' first round KOs.
It has relevance because it shows that he could beat anyone that ever got in the ring with him. There are no questions hanging over his head the way there are with other heavyweight greats, no one you can say that always had his number.
True but nobody really thought mediocre fighters like McCall or Rahman were better than him. Everybody knew these were fluke losses. Just like nobody in their right mind still thinks Purrity or Sanders were consistently better than Wlad. Or Thompson better than Haye. Also: What if McCall had overdosed on drugs after his win vs. Lewis. A hypothetical event that would be entirely outside of Lewis' realm of influence. What would Lewis have done then? He'd have been the same great boxer, just he wouldn't have had that pathetic 2nd fight vs. McCall. Makes no difference at all to his legacy IMO.