Pretty much all boxing historians are worthless pieces of **** who venerate 200 year-old pugs no one else has ever heard of but this guy does have Ali in his top 10 all-time HWs so he's just trolling in this interview. http://www.doghouseboxing.com/DHB/Tyler021512.htm
Probably the stupidest boxing opinion I have ever personally seen/heard EVER! (Dude should get booted out of all circles of this sport) ^Trying to make a name for himself at Ali's expense. ****** knows Ali is in the news right now & this **** wants to capitalize on it.
seriously nobody gives a **** about those old timers who no one living today has ever even seen fight that ****** Tony Triem wasn't even around when those guys fought and still nut hugs
I bet hes not even a historian. Ellie says that about anybody that talks to him about boxing. The fact where replying over that ******ed **** he says is even dumber.
This content is protected I googled the name "Tony Triem" and this was the image that was shitted out. Needless to say I was not "Shocked!" Upon first impression dude prob has a bunch of sheets with eye holes in them.
Looked him up and there's an interview where he says his top ten heavyweights are: Jeffries, Johnson, Dempsey, Louis, Ali, Tunney, Corbett, Liston, Marciano and Larry Holmes.... Obviously on some trolling ****.
most boxing historians dont the guy has a right to an opinion and probably is well researched in Fits who I suppose has a good argument But to call Ali a bum is wrong...probably just his way of getting people to hear his 2 cents