fighters who's records don't tell the true story

Man....I thought this was going to be an interesting thread. This is a HATING Thread. I had assume this would be about fighters with awful records but it doesn't tell the full story nor a true indication of how talented talented they were. I came in here ready to alk about guys like Emanuel Augustus, Chop Chop Corley, Bert Cooper and more. And It's just a bunch of Haters saying Williams and Alexander were given gifts...blah blah blah. Damn, these haters ruin the forum and utterly destroys the opportunity for "real" Boxing fans to engage in some great discussions about the sport.

SMH!!!

 

Mayweather should have 1 lose against Castillo where
punch statistics, commentators and so on, agreed that he lost
against Castillo.

 

Vitali. If you go by his record, it looks like he's lost twice.

 

Mayweather should be 43 wins, 0 losses, 60123 ducks.

 

Id favor a prime Big G but he is past his best now.

Otis tisdale was another one
and ofc ross the boss

 

Baldomir
sam soliman
dhafir smith

 

Juan Manuel Marquez should be 60-1-1 (40 KOs)

:deal

 

Demarcus "Chop Chop" Corley is much better than his record would suggest.

 

Orlando Salido has a very deceptive record as well.

 

Tony Pace is better than his 4-4 record suggests

Terry Carrughers is good even though he has a losing record.

Ricky Burns early loses effect peoples views on him too.

 

Funny, Zaveck should of have "0" too...he was robbed against Jackiewicz 1 and headbutted by Berto...