in the grand scheme of things do legacy really mean anything?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DrX, Feb 21, 2013.


  1. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    Legacy is to me pretty much everything... I would look out for my best interests if I were a pro but I'm not, I'm fan.
     
  2. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    When its all said and done the only thing that lasts forever is your legacy. So yea i would say it means something.
     
  3. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    Eventually the entire universe will run out of energy.
     
  4. Bushbaby

    Bushbaby Member Full Member

    312
    0
    Feb 15, 2013
    Brother, you are trippin. Absolutely everyone knows who SRL is & was. And there are only a handful of people on Gods planet who are stupid enough to say He's forgotten or that Floyd is greater.
     
  5. VBOX

    VBOX JOURNEYMAN Full Member

    5,702
    3,817
    Feb 8, 2012
    Anyone that openly admits to fighting for money and not for legacy is pretty much admitting that they ducked a fight. How can you have a great legacy and it not come with financial rewards? How many great fighters did not make it to main event status or made below average earnings? It is redundant to say I am a professional boxer and I fight for money when they all do. The only guys that should be content with making a buck and nothing else are journeymen.
     
  6. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    Not tripping at all. You are vastly over-rating the popularity and relevance of boxing. In the US he might be more known, but give that that constitutes less than 5% of people in the world then I don't agree at all that 'everyone' knows who SRL is. In fact, I would be highly surprised if anything more than a small minority were even aware of who SRL is, and I would be very confident that hardly anyone outside of boxing fans could even name one person he faced, or comment on anything that happened in his career.

    As boxing fans we can become very insular, you would be surprised of the number of people who literally could not give one **** about our sport, and might only be able to name Mike Tyson and Ali if pushed.
     
  7. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    32
    Dec 25, 2009
    :deal

    Does anyone give two shits about what Frederick the Great accomplished? Most of us only know of certain people because their names were shoved down our throats in history class.

    Here's a good example, the great Harry Greb is often argued to be the greatest pugilist of all time yet his name eludes even some of the more ardent boxing fans. What more the general public?

    I get what some are saying that legacy = immortality but as time passes this immortality drifts into obscurity as people forget about them and records are lost. That's why fans usually offset this by putting on the rose-tinted glasses.

    There WILL be better fighters who show up. And as more time comes to pass, the more obscure a name becomes, the more fanatic you'll have to be to find a fighter.
     
  8. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    People who talk about floyd legacy act like it filled with tomato cans lol

    When he finally hangs them up, people will realise how good he was and how good his resume was.

    Yes his resume could be stronger but u can say that about any fighter.
     
  9. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    Anyone who says they don't want to leave a legacy or a lasting imprint in there perfession is lying there ass off. I believe those who realize they have no chance to be great are more concerned about money, sort of like an nba player on a bad team who doesn't get mad at losing because atleast they're still rich. When talking about Mayweather I believe most of his asinine statements stem from the fact that its seem no matter who he fights its always a larger segment of people who will still find a reason to tarnish his legacy.
    As fans we all have sides we take that lead to us making disrespectful statements towards those we consider there opposition, an as athletes I'm sure they brush most of it off but at the end of the day there still human, if your one of the best and all you constantly hear is how you'll never be this or you should of did that or you could never do this eventually your going to lash out and make statements that will allienate you from the segment that stands behind you.
     
  10. Derrick_Rose

    Derrick_Rose Guest

    Legacy is important, but it won`t Pay your bills.

    Other then that you knows if Boxing in 20-30 years will be relevant enough for people to care about legacies etc?
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    If I was a boxer and I had a choice of being able to live a comfortable life after boxing, but be over looked when talking about the best, or Being very respected, but strulging through life. I'd take the first choice in half a hart beat.
     
  12. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    The sad thing is that Mayweather could have had both. He's made tons of money and would have been the favorite in every big fight that wasn't made.

    Would I rather be rich and get love for life like Cotto and JMM, even Pac will or richer and get mixed applause and booed like Mayweather will?

    Personally, I'd take the former. But I can see why Mayweather has chosen the latter.

    Solid thread. Great topic to discuss. Well done.
     
  13. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    According to PBF **** no. It's all about the money. I don't understand why Floyd doesn't challenge himself ever. Just imagine if he beat Sergio and won the ****ing MW title. That puts PBF in with the greatest boxers of all time. Simple right? Nobody asks Floyd to do anything that he can't do. That's why I'm sick of defending him. Nobody asks Money to fight Andre Ward, Chad Dawson, or Wlad and Vitali. I don't know why Floyd doesn't want to go down in boxing history at the really old boxing age of 36. It is what is though.