Seldon or Peter, who was the better fighter?

Peter accomplished much more in the sport. Seldon might have been a little more physically gifted, outside of the chin, but Peter's drive carried him to higher success.

 

Anyone got anything to say?

This content is protected

 

Peter. He didn't freeze/quit as much as Bruce.

 

Spot on, as usual. :good

Judging Seldon's entire career on one night against an absolute beast is doing him a disservice. What's even worse is when people try to do the same with Michael Spinks.

 

You mean when he freeze/quit once? Let's see how Peter fight that mid 90's version of Tyson? I doubt Peter with his style make it out the first round.

 

both sucked..but atleast Peter took his beating like a man..Seldon just threw the damn fight with Tyson

 

:nod

 

He also smashed Joe Hipp, :good

 

prime peter (first wlad fight) breaks down seldon in mid rounds.

 

Nail, head, fin.

 

Bruce Seldon was a better fighter. Sam Peter was tough but he was like the black Butterbean and had no technique at all

 

So Tyson was scary, big ****ing deal. The rest of the bums who were terrified of him at least waited to get hit before they had enough. Even a stiff like McNeely at least had the dumb palooka gumption to go out there and throw.

 

the way Seldon dropped in some of his fights makes me put him really low on any list.

 

Way to miss the point, ******.

 

It was a shocking career-blotting moment of cowardice from a fighter who wasn't really that good in the first place and who was mostly just one of Don King's house bums. Deal with it.