This will be a bit different because Wladimir's prime was during the later stages of his career while Ali's prime was during his younger days. That being said, it's still a fun debate to have. Young Ali 61-64(Moore,Jones,Cooper,Liston I) vs Ross Purrity Jamaal Mccline Chris Byrd Corrie Sanders Lamont Brewster Francis Botha Prime Ali 65-67 vs Sam Peter Chris Byrd Rematch Calvin Brock Lamont Brewster Rematch Sultan Ibragimovic Tony Thompson Eddie Chambers Sam Peter Rematch Come Back Ali (1970) Quarry-Frazier I-Ellis vs David Haye Jean-Marc Mormeck Tony Thompson II Mariuz Wach Older Ali vs TBD.
With the listings of Young, Prime, and Comeback Ali atm, Ali would barely lose rounds against that opposition.
Do you mean Mythical Ali, or actual Ali who was knocked down and nearly lost to a 175 lb man? Mythical Ali doesn't lose a round. Actual Ali loses 3-4 fights.
Wlad's resume is rather poor, only his poor chin caused him to lose. Ali has a cast iron chin so would sail through easily taking no losses
How can you be so hypocritical? People defend Wladimir and say he's chin is 'good' because he keeps getting back up .. yet Ali not only got back up but won the fight and his chin is bad? Which 3-4 fights does he lose?
Actually, Wlads first fight with Brewster was well into his prime in terms of yrs and rounds and LOC. And that is the only fighter and version of a fighter who Ali, in any of his "periods" loses to. And on a side note......... Brewster, Peter, Thompson, Sanders, Haye, Chambers, Chagaev, Rahman, Sultan, Byrd and Schultz beat most anyone on Ali's resume except, Foreman, Frazier, and maybe Norton.