Should Froch Have Been DQ'd Against Bute?

Christian erikson?

 

**** you mate, when did I ever say that. And you mother to, so I can have the full package of ******s on my dick.

 

hahaha ofc not. In my opinion that rule only works for when the opponent acually has a shot of winning the fight.

It's a VERY situational rule and in this situation it's wrong to DQ him by all means.

 

the ref was to blame, he waved off the fight and then started giving bute a standing count.

also, bute's corner were on the ring before hearn cause they also thought the ref had stopped the fight.

 

True!! The referee starts to wave out the fight,but then started to count?? i think thats why eddie hearn and some from butes camp intered the ring...but anyway..BUTE was Knock out cold.

 

Bute's corner was gonna stop it anyway.

 

STFU *******. :tired:tired

I don't get the point of this kind of threads.

 

Molina/Kirkland ref says yes.

 

If it was the case Bute's clan would have fill a protest! Froch won fair and square.

 

How about when Bute's trainer walked in the ring. Shouldn't he get disqualified for that too?

 

its the promoter not the trainer.

so no.

 

Trainer did came long after the promoter I believe.

 

lets be honest...if anyone deserves a loss its Mayweather v Judah when his trainer came in and the ref went against the rules.

 

in the ring after, but maybe onto to side of the ring before and that is not allowed either.

plus hearn is not part of froch's corner.

anyways pointless thread, no one would have been happy with a DQ win, probably not even Bute himself.

 

1-the ref waved the fight off, then changed his mind and gave Bute a standing 8 count?!!!!

2-Hearn was not a member of Froch's corner so its no different to a fan running in the ring. If Froch's trainer had ran in then you would have a case (see Hatton v Smith).

3-the ref could have given him a standing 1,000 it would have made no odds,Bute's ass was whooped and his glass chin shattered.