Why is this the weakest era of HW boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Meow, Mar 10, 2013.


  1. TheNeonSalmon

    TheNeonSalmon Active Member Full Member

    1,247
    0
    Aug 1, 2012
    The idiot don't know that Berbick and Smith were champs in the 80's not the 90's.
     
  2. TheNeonSalmon

    TheNeonSalmon Active Member Full Member

    1,247
    0
    Aug 1, 2012
    The heavyweights today get in shape? You're insane. Solis,Chisora,Fury (first half of his career)
    Chris Arreola,Sherman Williams,Tony Thompson,Chauncy Welliver,Andy Ruiz Jr
     
  3. TheNeonSalmon

    TheNeonSalmon Active Member Full Member

    1,247
    0
    Aug 1, 2012
    Huck DID beat Povetkin no two ways about it!
     
  4. StWerburghs

    StWerburghs Active Member Full Member

    1,033
    14
    Mar 11, 2006
    You think Chisoras a super heavy?? He's a small heavyweight by todays standards.

    Maybe you were thinking about Haye vs Valuev??
     
  5. Berliner

    Berliner Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,114
    0
    Feb 14, 2013
    :patsch
     
  6. Berliner

    Berliner Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,114
    0
    Feb 14, 2013
    my bad the 80es were the weakest era.
     
  7. TheNeonSalmon

    TheNeonSalmon Active Member Full Member

    1,247
    0
    Aug 1, 2012
    Chisora is 245 pounds! Superheavweight refers to weight not height.
    It's called HEAVYWEIGHT not HEAVYHEIGHT.

    Chisora is 6'1" so not very tall still big. Wide as a rhino. Chisora is a superheavyweight.
     
  8. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    90s flashback: "George Foreman, old, fat and immobile, won two-thirds of the available titles Saturday night."
     
  9. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,662
    Jul 8, 2010
    Oh Christ. Is this idiot for real?

    Today a fighter's considered in good shape if he weighs in in the 240s. That tells you all you need to know.
     
  10. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    No they werent, get off boxrec & watch the ****ing fights.

    Holmes, Tyson, Witherspoon, Thomas, Dokes etc.. much better than todays division.
     
  11. TheNeonSalmon

    TheNeonSalmon Active Member Full Member

    1,247
    0
    Aug 1, 2012
    Tony Tucker was a great fighter. Speed,one punch power,height,reach,athleticism. And then Tyson came around. So in the 80's we had at least a few good fighters just like we have a few good fighters today.
     
  12. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Foreman > Valuev

    Please stop responding to my posts, you are a genuine weirdo
     
  13. Berliner

    Berliner Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,114
    0
    Feb 14, 2013
    this was funny ****... foreman slow as **** but still KOed champions and contenders:D
    yup great era
     
  14. TheNeonSalmon

    TheNeonSalmon Active Member Full Member

    1,247
    0
    Aug 1, 2012
    George Foreman was a great fighter! He had one punch KO power and landed his shot. Moorer wasnt even the best champion of the 90's. The 90's had Holyfield,Bowe,Lewis,Tyson,Moorer,Bruno,Morrison,Tua,Ibeabuchi,Foreman

    Yeah the 90's were ten times better than the current division.
     
  15. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,662
    Jul 8, 2010
    I know he did, but I'm referring to an official decision.

    Cunningham also beat Adamek who outweighed him by twenty pounds.