The "0" must never go. An excuse was necessary to gracefully evade a dangerous confrontation which could jeopardize his unblemished record. We can't say for sure but I think this is the reason why FLOYD Sr. came up with his baseless opinion that Pacquiao was taking performance enhancing drugs. His attempted graceful escape was not graceful at all. As the old saying goes, "you reap what you sow." He tried to plant the idea of Pacquiao being guilty of BUI (Boxing Under the Influence) and now his family is reaping all the harsh criticisms from boxing fans after the cancellation of the mega fight, despite of the failed negotiations caused by flimsy drug testing reasons. As for Floyd, I dont really know what to look forward to. All I am certain though is that he may retire undefeated but his legacy will forever be tainted by that cowardly stain caused by avoiding Pacquiao.
if the judges had given castillo the victory in their 1st fight then im certain floyds career would have been totally different, he would have fought the best instead of the rest the 0 is great for his legacy but damaging too
I disagree. Losing a fight would have been the best thing for his legacy. He wouldn't have avoided fighters if he didn't have a 0 to protect. He would likely have a number of better wins on his record.
Oh **** you've done it now. You pissed off the *****s and they are going to come by the dozens. You sir, have just been added to ***** **** list.
