What do you rate Tyson Fury's chances against David Haye?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dynamito_2012, Mar 15, 2013.


  1. Dynamito_2012

    Dynamito_2012 Active Member Full Member

    993
    0
    Oct 19, 2012
    I heard Fury on "thaboxingvoice" radio show and he said that Haye beat a journeyman in Chisora. He didn't just beat him, he stopped him. Now, I like Fury, but I'm not sure he would fair that well against Haye if they fought. The only advantage for Fury, would be his size.

    Haye struggled to land a big shot on Wladimir, so fighting Fury, someone who's 3 inches taller than Wladimir, could pose a slight problem for Haye. I still think that Haye could land big on Fury, like he did against Valuev. But is Fury's chin as tough as Valuev's?

    If Haye returns and does fight for a mandatory position, he would have to do it quick because Fury could go after the mandatory spot vs Povetkin or whoever. But Fury was calling David Haye a ***** on the show, so I'd be interested to see how Haye reacts to that.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    I'd heavily favour Haye in this match up.
     
  3. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    Fury is much quicker on his feet than Valuev, has a much better jab, and could keep Haye at bay for most of the fight, also, Haye is known to have a very low output against tall fighters, but he can land a single big shot that can put out Fury's lights if given the chance

    65/35 in favour of Haye
     
  4. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    7,875
    13
    Mar 28, 2012
    Haye via KO. Too Slick.

    This content is protected
     
  5. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
    I'd favour Haye hugely against Fury. He's too quick, athletic and potentially hits too hard. Fury may cause some issues, but I think Haye would have way too much for him.
     
  6. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    He dosnt have a chance. Haye is too quick and can bang.

    Wlad was good enough to keep Haye at distance not allowing him in close which left him ineffective in that fight.

    Fury is bigger than Wlad, but is not skilled enough to keep Haye at distance every second of every round.

    As soon as Haye gets inside he swarms him with bombs.
     
  7. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    24
    Jan 29, 2011
    A year ago I wouldve said Haye wins via massacre but its a different fight these days.

    Fury has worked really hard on his conditioning & his fundamentals, he looks like a different fighter compared to the chubby guy who walked onto a Pajkic hayemaker.

    I still favour Haye, due to his speed & explosive power but I think Fury can use his footwork & jab to good effect, he'll land leather on Haye but he only needs to make one mistake or lose concentration for a split second & the fight could be all over.
     
  8. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,757
    29,703
    Jan 18, 2010
    If Haye does his backfoot potshot "he has to because of the size difference" routine, he's going to lose a decision or gets caught along the way.

    But if Haye comes to fight, I can't see Fury standing much of a chance other than landing something big before he gets nailed himself.
     
  9. Ahurath

    Ahurath Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,270
    246
    Feb 25, 2012

    Well you have to understand that you CAN'T compare Wladimir klitschko a atg boxer who protect his glass chin really really good against Haye.

    But I can see Haye landing shots and it's then we know if Fury can take them. So for me it's a clear advantage for Haye because of his speed, defenensive skills and his explosiveness.



    Well this is acually very true. Fury has imrpoved a heck of alot since that fight.