If Haye beats Charr impressively, what will that say about Vitali?

No. It means that Vitali is age 41, old and faded.

The last fight in which Vitali looked really good and still in his prime was Arreola in 2009.

Vitali still looked okay at age 40 against Adamek in 2011, but his age really showed in his past two fights against Chisora and Charr.

Danny Williams said in an interview yesterday that although Haye would have no chance against the prime Vitali he fought, Haye would definitely beat the current faded old Vitali.

 

Not sure how Vit looked old vs Charr. Unless he wins KO1 he looks old I guess.

 

Foreman beat Frazier easier than Ali did. Therefore, Foreman is better than Ali.

David Price beat Harrison better than Haye did. Therefore, Price is better than Haye.

I be doing the hasing of an amazing intelligence.

 

Yes, Lennox Lewis was clearly better than Vitali.

Lennox is a top ten ATG heavyweight.

Vitali is very good and underrated by some people. But he's a step down from Lennox and definitely not a top ten ATG heavyweight.

 

Beating Charr means nothing or maybe it means that Vitali is more brutal. He wants to play longer with his prey before the kill.

 

Vitali is shot to ****, look at 3 of his last 4 fights:

Charr EVT4 Vitali
Solis EVT1 Vitali
Chisora EVT12 Vitali

 

Only idiots think like this and it never changes. "Foreman must be superior to Ali because he destroyed Frazier and Norton while Ali struggled against them!!!". Welcome to boxing where styles make fights. Instead of starting 10 trolling threads a day you might want to read about the sport.

 

I don't need to see him beat anyone to know right now Haye is superior to Vitali and is the number 2 HW in the World right now, old Vitali has looked awful for the last few years

He would ko Charr in the first few rounds anyway