I'm not disputing the decision just the way in which Rigo won. Again, do you think fights like Dirrell-Stevens showed high levels of the "sweet science"? If you don't say yes than how can you say the same thing about this fight? If you do say yes, well boxing will not be around for very much longer.
Please, ask any member of your family to stay with you until the danger of your committing suicide has passed.
I'm not really a big Donaire fan TBH. The fight was pretty bad and no one on here wants to say it. Or if you do YDSAB, the "mantra of the morons" as Bill Hicks said.
*******s aka OP always find creative ways to take out their frustrations after their fighter loses. This content is protected
Except that Rigo got hit and even had his ass down Whitaker was slick. Toney was slick. They elude punches by bobbing and weaving at close distance and at the same time fight. Rigo kept 2 kms distance the entire 12th round.
Rigo's good , he could throw more punches tho. The same can be said for Donaire. Both guys limit themselves.
A few rounds were disappointingly stagnant, but you can't blame Rigo. Donaire is to blame for not changing his gameplan. Once it was obvious that his normal attack wasn't working, he should have gone inside & banged away, but he seemed completely lost. Still, this fight was miles better than Rios-Alvarado. - Those fights were embarrassing slugfests.
I think about it the same way as you do and I also said this in my thread.:good I'm gonna watch those people who said that they love to watch "Sweet Seience" to find out what they are gonna say after watching more fights of this boring Cuban fighter in the future. You people are so excited about him.