Was Canelo win over Trout a fishy dec.?

I thought Canelo did more than enough to win.

 

:deal

 

When ever a black American looses a clear decision it is a robbery

 

no.canelo took it 115-112

 

If you say so, chief.

Ever thought of following a different sport ?

 

I had Canelo narrowly winning the fight, but the cards were bad.

 

I follow several sports buddy, whats the problem?

 

The fix was clearly in before the fight, but the right guy won anyway.

 

118? Come on.

 

:deal

 

"Was Canelo win over Trout a

This content is protected

dec"

 

effective punching over volume.

 

Your analysis of the fight is sooooo faaaaar off, is the problem.

That's not all that bad. Others sometimes come to differing conclusions as to how a fight should have been scored.

What makes you sound like an arrogant idiot is your comments on Trout's take on the fight. It couldn't have been plainer that Trout felt he lost. And unlike some ****heads who rant and rave about robbery when they lose, Trout showed a lot of class by conceding, congratulating his victor, and refusing to make excuses, He offered an explanation in saying that he had underestimated Canelo. Class act.

And do you think Trout, or anyone else, gives a flying **** if you lose all respect for him if he doesn't start whining in two weeks time ?

It's bad enough that you couldn't score the fight properly. It's a whole lot more classless when you start in on Trout on account of your myopic vision of how it went.

You were in your armchair. Trout was in the ****in' ring. He knew what he landed, and what he got hit with. And he knew who won.

 

I just think it was a close fight; that of course doesn't always mean its controversial. Could have gone either way, or drawn. Its fair enough for my taste.

 

There's a time and a plaice for that type of humour.