So the majority of press an fans had the fight for Trout?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Apr 22, 2013.


  1. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
    MW owning himself again, lulz.
     
  2. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    You know me, I score it as a fight first, boxing match second. I haven't seen it yet though. Should be interesting when I do. During the Adamek/Cunningham fight Adamek's trainer was interviewed and thought his guy was scoring the heavier shots. This is something that is harder to pick up on TV.
     
  3. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Ask him who was floored in this fight.
     
  4. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    What does "the majority of press" mean to you?
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    either way that is why they have 3 judges. What they decide is who wins.
     
  6. Higher Animal

    Higher Animal Member Full Member

    290
    0
    Aug 24, 2012
    My theory is that boxing forum fans like to pretend they know more than everybody else and pick the "boxer" who is unknown to casual fans. This is psychological, making those who pick against the grain feel special and different from the masses.

    "See that jab? See those punches? See how he isn't just swinging his arms like a gorilla?"

    I heard a commenter on ESPN actually say, "This isn't a who hurts the other person more thing. It's a fight!" On these very forums I heard somebody defending Austin Trout say, "Well he can't help the fact that he can't punch hard enough!"

    If boxing changes from a contest of will, intelligence, and technique into a slapping competition then boxing will officially be dead.
     
  7. Miguel

    Miguel Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,604
    1
    Nov 29, 2012
  8. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Nobody knows how hard each guy is punching, it's not being measured objectively. The guy who lands more power punches in more rounds should win. That was Trout. It was like when nobody gave Bradley any credit for the punches he was landing on Pac, and one Pac punch could win the round. Just because people perceived Pac as punching so much harder. I never saw Bradley hurt. Trout was hurt in one round. Most of the other rounds Canelo did nothing, he focused all his energy on slipping punches and not firing back. It isn't a who hurt who more thing, it's a 'who won the most rounds' thing.
    That was Trout, 115-112.
     
  9. [JoKeR]

    [JoKeR] Member Full Member

    276
    0
    Dec 10, 2012
    Completely agree with everything you said. I had it 115-113 Trout.
     
  10. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    115-112 Canelo. Deal with it, i dont remember any trout moments from the fight but remember many Canelo moments. Plus if i remember all ESB polls have Canelo winning.
     
  11. captain hook

    captain hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,804
    388
    Dec 11, 2011
    i saw more power punches by canelo.. watch it again
     
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,361
    26,894
    Jul 21, 2012
    You dont score points for avoiding punches.
    1-3 punches landed dont win rounds.
    A couple of rounds Canelo landed nothing at all. Especially the 12th
    Anywhere else in the world Trout would of won.
     
  13. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    What if those 3 punches were way more effective than the 10 or so jabs trout would land? I saw the fight as Trout flicking a few jabs out and once the distance closed he would get ripped with a uppercut or something way more prominent than ANYTHING he landed. So it comes down to effective punching or volume.

    Its funny the same people saying trout won are also most of the same people that say Hopkins beat Calzaghe....smh.
     
  14. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    Trout was wobbled on one or two other occasions, albeit momentarily. Those Canelo right uppercuts inside especially were doing damage. You're right in saying that who punches harder should be irrelevant, but you must take into account how clean the punches are, if they had an effect on the opponent etc. Canelo landed the slightly better punches overall in that fight for me, more effective. Quality over quantity. Round 6, for instance. It was a close round but I was leaning towards Trout based on workrate until the last few moments. He was a lot busier and landed some good shots to the body, however Canelo landed several great shots in the last few seconds which eclipsed anything Trout had landed in terms of quality. Based on the closeness of the round and that strong finish I gave it to Canelo, but I know there's many who wouldn't have. You can't just say 'Trout landed more punches, he wins'. Doesn't work like that. I think you can score that fight either way, but within' one or two rounds of each other. 115-112 Trout, don't think I can see that.

    I have no problem with Canelo getting the decision, although the official judging was a joke.
     
  15. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    It was a close fight Canelo won what's the big deal?And I was pulling for Trout big time he just didn't do enough to get the nod:-(