At the end of the day Fury doing what he's doing has people talking about him. Bad publicity is better than no publicity as they say - I hope Tyson keeps rubbing those up the wrong way who don't like him and for those who can't see that he is in fact, actually a good character for boxing.
I can't see what all the outrage is, although slightly over the top it's not that biased. Fury did push and shove a lot, fury did use his forearm to set up the final punch and I wouldn't really say a less than 50% ko percentage was good for a fighter at the higher weights. Tyson fury fans are starting to become like Amir khan fans where any time says a negative thing about him they are haters with an agenda.
This is the problem with boxrec analysts. He has dropped lots of fighters even in fights in which he has lost. To say that Cunningham is 'notoriously light fisted' is the greatest load of bull**** that I have read for a while. The article is biased as ****, no question. This guy wouldnt dream of writing that if Fury was a Sky fighter.