Fast Eddie to make more signings

Beeston- Calling him OpinionStealer http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=444494&page=11

DrMo- Calling him a parrot http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=431820&highlight=parrot&page=5

Paraphrased but shows they have the same opinion on him as me

 

clutching at straws a bit there. seems more like banter from DrMo.

 

Whatever Rob, you wanted examples and I gave them to you. Go back to your Hearn love-in threads if you're not happy

Here's the Bellew-Cleverly prediction thread you made http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?p=9691389#post9691389 Calls Beeston's point out on saying Bellew has better fundamentals & uses the atsch emoticon. Then never bothers to give his reasons why he disagrees- the best thing was by following the consensus, he got proven completely wrong later when Bellew outboxed Cleverly before gassing!

So much for him criticizing Beeston, who actually had it spot on...

 

Everyone can be an after timer. I am sure you have gotten plenty of predicitons wrong.

Please find me the Hearn love in threads?

 

It wasn't intended as banter, he is a parrot

I might disagree with a fair amount of your posts but I respect that fact you have your own opinions & are prepared to defend them.

 

I definitely have. That's not what I was saying though. He criticises others (arrogant enough to say 'worst comment ever') but then doesn't offer any insight of his own. Flea even asks him to 'analyse' whoever the fighter was in his avatar's style- yet he doesn't even though he calls him "the greatest of all time". Aptly sums him up to be honest.

Where's he gone anyway? I asked him to find me that thread he said I was ignoring him in.

Rob, you're well known to be the biggest Eddie arselicker on here. It's the reason most people find you to be a very tedious poster. If it's not you moaning about Frank one minute, it's you leaping to Hearn's defence the next. Your infatuation with Promoters is a bit sad in truth

 

Likewise. I think we have differing opinions on quite a few different fighters but at least I know you are making a fair judgement from what you've seen.

After all, it's a forum- people are meant to debate. But to portray yourself as superior to others like BoxingAnalyst does but not back it up is hypocritical IMO

 

B.A's alright lads, I never had a problem with him.

 

Was that second but directed at me?

I assumed it was with the post above

 

I have ripped Hearn apart 100x on this forum in recent months. been very critical of him and spoke to him one on one this week and slated him.

I am anti Frank. Never deny it. In terms of anti Frank stuff I have posted on this forum its about 10% of what i have been told. But not pro Hearn. My assessments of him are fair.

 

I held a grudge against him after the hagman thread. It was a laugh at first but the joke got old eventually and he kept on bumping the thread for no reason but to just mock him when he was still posting as gemmell.

That was a petty move IMO

 

Where? What did you say to him?

 

Spoke or typed?

 

No I give you that, I do remember it but since then he's hardly ever acted like that, we all have our bad days and I have quite a few, I also think he does knows his stuff despite the lack of breakdowns, I'm guilty of that myself. :good

 

The difference is (well from what I've seen) that you don't start having a go at people for not writing a breakdown on fights. Of course people don't have to write long winded posts if they don't want to- but don't then go around moaning at others for not doing so!

He's a hypocrite