Lmaooo! Brook fighting van heerdon next!!!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Hard Hitta, Apr 28, 2013.


  1. Hearn will jump on this and be on the phone to south africa

    Dont believe that his opponent will be better than van heerdon because he wont
     
  2. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    There's nothing wrong with this fight if it's true. I'd happily watch it. Van Heerden's best win is Hatton, Brook's second best win is Hatton so it's not like they're poles apart. Brook isn't as proven as people seem to think he is, so a fight like this isn't bad at all. Van Heerden would likely lose but it's good preparation for a world title fight.
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    Khan is a multiple world champion, Brook has never fought a world class fighter. In what way are those two comparable, outside of your Khan obsessed mind?
     
  4. hitmanhickson

    hitmanhickson New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Apr 13, 2013


    Ouch.
     
  5. Hard Hitta

    Hard Hitta Guest

    Still wanking over my pictures ouve got saved on your computer lowlife lazarus?
     
  6. BUSTER

    BUSTER Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,814
    0
    Nov 24, 2010
    Iv got tickets to the hull show and was actually quite hoping it was true because as a 'keep busy' fight i think it would be good
     
  7. BUSTER

    BUSTER Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,814
    0
    Nov 24, 2010
    ??
     
  8. hitmanhickson

    hitmanhickson New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Apr 13, 2013
    Ill be going to the hull show too. Think it'd be a decent fight really although obviously I'd prefer Alexander. Brook is still mandatory, despite what team Khan and saj aka the poor mans watson brother says
     
  9. WhamBam

    WhamBam Keeping Cool Full Member

    2,134
    0
    Jul 30, 2010
    iron_chin **** off u nonce
     
  10. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    The fact that he hasn't fought a world class fighter is pretty laughable. He's been a pro for eight and a half years. Eight. He first won the British title nearly five years ago!

    Even taking into consideration his recent misfortune he has had plenty of other opportunities to test himself against better opposition. His career has been to date, a wasted opportunity, and it is perfectly reasonable to criticise/mock him for a succession of underwhelming opponents.
     
  11. hitmanhickson

    hitmanhickson New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Apr 13, 2013
    Have people actually considered that kell was held back by certain promoters ? Fought the same guy 3 times in a year. Offered a title fight at 154
     
  12. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    I've no doubt he's had issues with promoters and injuries (of late), whilst not helping his own career with some dubious conduct outside the ring, but the fact remains that he's been a pro for 8 and a half years, and he's fought no one of note. His career is becoming a bit of a joke - he needs to take some risks from here on in.
     
  13. Prosinecki

    Prosinecki SPINAL Full Member

    328
    0
    Nov 12, 2011
    I would be happy with this fight, provided I could listen to the South African commentary.
     
  14. PaulieMc

    PaulieMc Guest

    Get that bloke "singing" Eye of the Tiger at the start again too. :lol: