Why is Froch not in The Ring top 10 P4P yet they have Broner at #6?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by freedom2013, May 29, 2013.


Page 1 of 3
  1. freedom2013

    freedom2013 Boxing Junkie banned

    8,424
    6
    Jan 12, 2013
    It seems ridiculous The Ring has Adrien Broner at #6 and yet they've left Carl Froch off once again.

    Agree or disagree?
     
    freedom2013, May 29, 2013
    freedom2013, May 29, 2013
    #1
  2. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    The Ring has become a joke.

    That's about all you need to know.
     
    Smokin' Joe, May 29, 2013
    Smokin' Joe, May 29, 2013
    #2
  3. JasonHensley

    JasonHensley Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,590
    94
    Jan 20, 2008
    The Ring is owned by GBP.....
     
    JasonHensley, May 29, 2013
    JasonHensley, May 29, 2013
    #3
  4. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    Because the Ring **** worships American fighters. They've always been like that though, the GBP buyout hasn't made any difference.
     
    Larryboys, May 29, 2013
    Larryboys, May 29, 2013
    #4
  5. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    Even the biggest Broner fan struggles to justify it.
     
    ChipChair, May 29, 2013
    ChipChair, May 29, 2013
    #5
  6. ArtOWAR

    ArtOWAR Fartdawg Full Member

    920
    0
    Oct 25, 2012
    Because the p4p label is a joke now days like the alphabets
     
    ArtOWAR, May 29, 2013
    ArtOWAR, May 29, 2013
    #6
  7. MannySteward

    MannySteward Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,660
    4
    May 1, 2011
    I think P4P is bull**** anyway. Makes no sense.

    But for the purposes of answering your question, what criteria do you use to rank P4P freedom?
     
    MannySteward, May 29, 2013
    MannySteward, May 29, 2013
    #7
  8. freedom2013

    freedom2013 Boxing Junkie banned

    8,424
    6
    Jan 12, 2013
    It's a combination of things, the quality of opponents the fighter has beaten being the single most important criteria.
     
    freedom2013, May 29, 2013
    freedom2013, May 29, 2013
    #8
  9. Lucian Bute

    Lucian Bute Active Member Full Member

    658
    0
    Jun 18, 2008
    GBP buyout has made it worse.

    The Ring has been a joke for years now. No credibility whatsoever.

    Waste of time to even refer to it.
     
    Lucian Bute, May 29, 2013
    Lucian Bute, May 29, 2013
    #9
  10. Lucian Bute

    Lucian Bute Active Member Full Member

    658
    0
    Jun 18, 2008
    Froch is definitely amongst the best ten fighters right now. Broner definitely isn't. Simple as.
     
    Lucian Bute, May 29, 2013
    Lucian Bute, May 29, 2013
    #10
  11. blank

    blank Active Member Full Member

    588
    3
    Dec 4, 2007
    The Ring? What? Oh, you mean GoldenBoy.com & GoldenBoy magazine?
     
    blank, May 29, 2013
    blank, May 29, 2013
    #11
  12. Kurushi

    Kurushi Active Member Full Member

    699
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
    I've got him at no. 8
     
    Kurushi, May 29, 2013
    Kurushi, May 29, 2013
    #12
  13. MannySteward

    MannySteward Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,660
    4
    May 1, 2011
    Fair enough. If quality of opposition is how you rank fighters than Froch should definitely be in the top 10.
     
    MannySteward, May 29, 2013
    MannySteward, May 29, 2013
    #13
  14. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    number 8 is about right for Froch.
     
    ChipChair, May 29, 2013
    ChipChair, May 29, 2013
    #14
  15. xRedx

    xRedx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    10
    Dec 17, 2012
    P4P in general is a BS concept.
     
    xRedx, May 29, 2013
    xRedx, May 29, 2013
    #15
Page 1 of 3