Are you feeling ok? First you pick the wrong Froch fight as his 'best fight', then you take Calzaghes defining performance against the much backed favourite and world champion Jeff Lacey and call it a 'slap fest'? Calzaghe battered him for 12 rounds in one of the most exciting fights of the decade. And Froch? Well... he is a warrior and simply out-warriored Bute in a display of warrior-ship.
[yt]http://youtu.be/qkXB-lL0ULI[yt] Not sure if this has worked to embed the vid? Edit - obviously not: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkXB-lL0ULI
Lacy A shot Sheika beat the **** out of him, a shot, inactive, rusty Reid lived with him and even a shot-to-smithereens, though still-sharp 168lb Roy Jones beat him just as easily and slightly more impressively than Calzaghe did. Push that non-fight aside and there's not a lot to go on with Joseph. He 'beat' 45-year-old Hopkins with sloppy workrate and slappy punches, a puffy, heavy-looking shot-to-smithereens Jones, life and death with a one-dimensional, inexperienced Kessler, life and death with a legless, unsharp version of Eubank, life and death with Reid, Sheika, Woodhall, Brewer, Mitchell, Salem...the list goes on. He was good, but barely very good and definitely not great. He clearly lost to Reid and Hopkins and clearly would've lost to Eubank if Chris wished to take one step back in the dying seconds and deliver one uppercut, I honestly think Eubank decided in a moment that he'd gain more respect losing than winning that night, and so let Joseph off the hook. Joseph looked terrible against the very average David Starie. Truly terrible.
It was a bloody slapfest,Lacy was terrible he looked like a clueless rookie in there getting ***** slapped by Joe with those pitty pat combos he likes to throw.10 years into being world champion and Jeff Lacy is his best win,Ill say no more. Also this thread is about show of skill,Froch put on a skilled show against Abraham utilising his jab and showing a good boxing brain which to me showed his capability as a boxer.With Bute he simply just walked through him,outmanned him and then knocked him out,that was more a showing of toughness than it was skill. Don't get my words twisted fool.
Two I was at when I was younger stick in my mind, McMillan v Stecca to win the belt and Herol Graham v Rod Douglas. Naz when he first turned pro, before he developed his own power, was so tough to hit and so fast. Just an incredibly instinctive boxer.
I think we can safely all agree that Hatton and Eubank are the skillsters of British Boxing History, and Calzaghe and Froch are the messy, crude operators.
Very impressive dominations, though Graham I prefer to call an awkward talent than a skillster-type. He was all speed, reflexes and extreme unorthodoxity. McMillan at his best was far more aesthetically pleasing to watch than 'Bomber'. He was a beautiful, beautiful boxer.
They certainly had very similar styles, Hatton and Eubank. Both held their hands in the same position - gloves pressed together at stomach-height, and this made it very difficult for their opponents to read what punch was going to be released next.
Honeyghan put on a fantastic against Curry, at the time that was one of the biggest upsets you could imagine, sent ripples through the boxing world. Still a great display, one of the best ever for a British fighter.
The 2nd round in particular is an almost flawless exhibition of boxing from Watson, not just defensively but offensively. He is literally punch-fcuking-perfect - along with Benn's fists swirling round his guard, we see Watson hit him with every shot in the book in this round. Not just jabs, though plenty of them; lead straight right hands, lead right uppercuts and baby Barrera-style left hook/uppercuts, uppercut-jab 1-2's, lead right-left hook 1-2's, digging body shots, the absolute works... in his quite methodical way Watson hits him with the kitchen sink. Benn lands maybe twice cleanly in the whole round.