Is Froch's resume now better than Calzaghe's?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mr fists, May 26, 2013.


  1. 17brandiff

    17brandiff Member Full Member

    493
    6
    Feb 25, 2009
    Froch has a better resume than Calzaghe.
     
  2. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Calzaghe > Froch
     
  3. tobias

    tobias Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,684
    0
    Feb 27, 2012
  4. SolarCycles1963

    SolarCycles1963 New Member Full Member

    36
    0
    May 26, 2013
    I agree with others Froch has the better resume but Calzaghe is the better boxer. I still think Froch would have beaten Calzaghe though with a very close decision.
     
  5. The Bane

    The Bane Active Member Full Member

    908
    4
    Sep 22, 2012
    How can people compare these 2 fighters. I like Froch but Calzaghe would school him to an easy decision.
     
  6. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,044
    Oct 13, 2010

    Not what the OP asked.

    Froch has a much deeper resume than Calzaghe
     
  7. Jimbob

    Jimbob Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    1
    Mar 14, 2009
    Froch's level of competition before the Super 6 was better than 99% of Calzaghe's WBO reign of terror.
     
  8. DBLOCK

    DBLOCK Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,536
    1
    Jul 27, 2011
    yup
     
  9. big_AL

    big_AL P4P #1 Full Member

    2,411
    59
    Jul 22, 2010
    oh ok so later careers don't matter? i guess calzaghe beating lacy then is right up there with duran beating leonard and ali beating foreman? and i suppose that unknown russian guy that lewis fought in his last fight just goes down as any other win?
     
  10. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Calzaghe would easily outbox Froch. Froch would have no chance.
     
  11. Serenata

    Serenata Fit und geimpft Full Member

    6,141
    1
    Oct 13, 2007
    Froch has the better resume now.
     
  12. Serenata

    Serenata Fit und geimpft Full Member

    6,141
    1
    Oct 13, 2007
    I agree but that was not the question ;)
     
  13. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    are people really so thick, the question is who's resume is better, not who would win h2h? imo froch has the better resume just, dont care if hes lost some of those fights because if you fight the best available your bound to lose some fights. Calzaghe whilst a great fighter had the potential to be the best british fighter in history if he took a few more chances mid way through his career. He had a spell of about 3 years where he fought pish poor opposition and cant remember the name now but he fought that german kid twice after battering him the 1st time! was sickening really
     
  14. Dinamita85

    Dinamita85 Guest

    Frochs best win - an aging version of kessler

    Calzaghes best win - Prime undefeated kessler or the B-hop who was ranked no1 at lightheavy in a close contest.

    and please dont tell me that Froch beat Dirrell which is a good win , that was an awful hometown decision...and im English.

    Calzaghe has a better resume although it could and should be far better , he is too blame as are a few other fighters who didnt want to fight him.

    Frochs resume gets overated cos hes fought a whose who of big names since he became champion and i admire his willingness to do so but are the names on it really all that good?
     
  15. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012

    thank you :happy