Worst Rules to Ever Grace The Sport

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by SkillspayBills, Jun 8, 2013.


  1. smegmaa

    smegmaa Undefeated Champ Full Member

    3,001
    0
    Mar 19, 2011
    That shitty WBC rule, of something like, of a fighters cut by a head clash and is behind on the cards then the fighter that caused it gets a point deduction or some bs
     
  2. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    :patsch Shocking :lol:.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,176
    Oct 22, 2006
    Exactly why I hate the rule...

    Lloyd Honeyghan was royally screwed because of this. The old rule was fine. If it is not broke, do not fix it!
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,176
    Oct 22, 2006
    Because boxing used be on Network/Terrestrial TV, and the 12 rounders fit much better into the TV hour...
     
  5. connorcinhull

    connorcinhull Active Member Full Member

    632
    1
    Jan 22, 2011
    I agree with the open scoring guy! Changes the field for a lot of fighters. Gives them the edge oftentimes, but scoring is controversial, so it doesn't always reflect the nature of the fight.
     
  6. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Agreed.

    Mandatory 8 count is a joke.

    Open scoring is a disgrace.
     
  7. Journey Man

    Journey Man Journeyman always. Full Member

    4,943
    2,116
    Aug 22, 2009
    Open scoring, ruins the suspense you get at the end of a close fight
     
  8. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    Really? What's wrong with it?

    standing eight-count is a bad rule.
     
  9. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    Computer based amateur scoring and the old domestic cut rules (now sorted (to an extent) thankfully).
     
  10. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    While this may have played a part, I think it's fair to say that the pieces fit together rather than this being the only reason. The reason put forward by the WBC at the time was health reasons following the Mancini v Deuk Koo Kim fight. Pressure from TV networks, plus the perceived health benefits probably made it a no brainer.

    I dont really have an opinion on 12 v 15 rounds. I think some of the fights we see on a 12 round basis are as good as the old 15 round fights. And it's swings and roundabouts. While we all would have loved an extra three rounds of Froch v Kessler, would we really have wanted an extra three rounds of Gamboa v Perez?

    I think research since though hasnt really been conclusive on whether 12 round fighs are safer than 15.
     
  11. Jim Bowen

    Jim Bowen MARVELOUS Full Member

    5,162
    0
    Aug 5, 2011

    Should just be a no contest with purse bids sent out immediately if its a title fight.
     
  12. Fightfan1912

    Fightfan1912 Active Member Full Member

    827
    3
    Dec 30, 2010
    Provided it was used correctly the standing count could be a good thing.

    A lot of Refs s**t themselevs and stop fights because fighters arent smart enough to take to a knee. The standing count if used in those situations could enhance the fight.
     
  13. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Do super/diamond/recess etc champ belts count?
     
  14. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    It would maybe be worth trying 1 allowed for each fighter; where a fighter is backed up against the ropes and not throwing back, then it could be better than a possibly early stoppage.
     
  15. I Shot JR

    I Shot JR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,651
    1,798
    Feb 17, 2012
    Fighter safety, TV and spectacle.