Burns vs Gamboa, possible?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Alan_Francis_85, Jun 8, 2013.


  1. richoxenham

    richoxenham Member Full Member

    100
    0
    Nov 30, 2012
    Who would you like burns to fight next then billy?
     
  2. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    I would like Abril,Vasquez or Beltran in that order,Ricky has been a champion 3 years nearly and I think it's long overdue a unification fight.
    as long as its quality opponents that the fans can watch a great fight that's what matters
     
  3. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

    Yep :yep
     
  4. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    But they both could have ducked, and that doesn't answer the accusation that Burns ducked.
     
  5. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

    I was pointing out that accusations of ducking can also be thrown at Broner, that is all.

    The answers to the whole Burns ducking thing has been thrown about for months. Ask Billy, im sure he'll explane for the 100th time.
     
  6. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    No Rossco I'm not saying it again theres obviously a problem that people can't understand lol
     
  7. Dragon Punch

    Dragon Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,909
    3,431
    Sep 15, 2012
    I'm sorry to be a nuisance, but I dont think I was around on the forum around the time Rees was offered and accepted the Broner fight which was apparently offered to you guys at Team Burns first so I would really appreciate if you could explain just one more time pls..
     
  8. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    :?:lol: NO:good
     
  9. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    What you said:

    "The stupid ****s on here saying Burns ducked Broner and having a go at Burns record should go and have a look at Broners record and history of blatant ducks."

    Which isn't a logical response. It's pretty much irrelevant to the issue.
     
  10. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

    I wasn't trying to be relevant, and i dont really give a flying **** what you thinks relevant or irrelevant.
     
  11. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    Oh OK. You just make random comments to people.
     
  12. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

    I wouldn't say it was a random comment either.