I know this is an age old debate but I think it's relevant as any decision now gets criticised mcdonnel ceja,canelo trout,froch Kessler are 3 that have really had interesting views on hereI think the obvious is its subjective which means in theory you score it how you see it so I don't like it when people disregard others attempts at scoring a bout as 'you don't understand boxing' as that is a self important patronising attitude Is there another way or is the ten must system still the best way to score.i believe it is but only because every other way is flawed But id be interested to hear opinions on how fights could be scored particularly to avoid home town and corrupt decisions
