Fury-Haye doesn't look like happening

more boxing bull.

 

Fury wants no part of Haye,or any top rated heavy's for that matter.

 

Fury should take the fight, he will lose his 0 and get KO'd. but might aswell make few mill doing it against Haye instead of some bum down bluewater in a co feature with chunky

 

Drink some coffee, it'll wake you up. :hey

No, I am stating facts: Haye is semiretired. He disgraced himself in a title fight and then, a year later, won against a journeyman, Chisora, who has never beaten anyone of consequence -- and who has himself won just twice since 2010 against fighters with a combined 38-55-4 record.

He has won just one fight since 2010 -- your spin, or insinuation, seems to be that Haye should be considered as if he had been winning fights all along since 2010, when in fact he flopped and ran in losing a title shot and has done frack-all since.

And if Tyson isn't ducking, why is he asking 80 percent? Why hasn't he signed? Why wasn't his response to Haye's twitter something like "I have accepted Haye's 50 percent terms. We can sign it today."

Haye and Tyson communicate through twitter. So do a lot of other people. What's illegitimate about basing opinions on what the fighters themselves put out on the social media?

 

Are you really this stupid? or are you doing this for a bet?. Seriously? people discuss and openly debate contractual terms on twitter?....Show me a link :deal

 

fury is shitting end of

 

IDIOT.

How exactly is Chisora a journeyman? He is a high profile fighter with promotional backing i.e people in suits with lots of money who invest in his career, each time he fights its in front of a live tv audience, often internationally and has mixed in 12 round championship class for some years.

If a fighter has all of the above, he is NOT a journeyman.

The other guy wasnt spinning or insinuating anything at all, he merely pointed out what you failed to point out and OWNED you in the process!

As did I :yep

 

Thank you,I rest my case.

Just one point though about my so called 'insinuation' I Clearly stated he had 'Won 1,Lost 1'. Not sure how that's spun that he has won all his fights...

 

I would not personally advise Fury to take this fight.

With the right match making, he can be steered to a big money title shot.

This is exactly the fight that is most likely to derail that.

 

Big money? Compared to a Haye fight?

How much would he get from a Klitschko and Channel 5?

 

Yeah I tend to agree, but the money is good for the Haye fight so I can understand why

 

Actually quite a fair amount. With Fury he'll only step up when he knows that he has a very decent chance of winning a belt. Frustrating but likely to happen.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

You have to be one of the biggest ************** I have seen on this forum.

Sometimes one of the best things in boxing is the lead up, hype and the smoke and mirrors that goes on in making a fight. The majority of people on here see through all of that but there is a minority like yourself that believe everything that is stated on twitter and other social media.

Fury v Haye is a massive fight that needs to be made and will be made because the desire to see it is huge and most importantly the money that both fighters, the promoters and everyone else involved will be bigger for all than if a Klitschko was involved.

 

This fight will happen.... This is classic haye hype machine in full swing..... Furys attempt at playalong reply on twitter gave the game away 80/20 ????? Come on open your eyes fight is s good as signed sealed delivered.