Referee Price/Thompson...

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Gullet, Jul 7, 2013.


  1. lefthook82

    lefthook82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,691
    776
    May 1, 2009
    If Terry O Connor was in there, Thompson gets stopped 'for his safety' in the 2nd
     
  2. Don't Damn Me

    Don't Damn Me Member Full Member

    220
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    The simple fact they are British does not make Fury and Haye domestic level fighters. Paul Smith is a domestic level super-middleweight, but he wouldn't stand a chance against Froch and already lost to Degale and Groves.

    Domestic level heavyweights are people like Sprott, Towers, McDermott, Audley and at a push Chisora.
     
  3. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    The truth is that when the ref gave a standing count, he should have stepped in and stopped it. Price had effectively quit both mentally and physically at that point. The ref just used the 8 seconds to look into his eyes and see he was done. I don't think Price was trapped but I think this occassion shows that a count was not needed but a straight stoppage. To avoid fighters having to guess a refs mindset, the ref should be vocal "defend yourself", "fight back", "show me something or I'll stop the fight". I am opposed to any unnecessary break in the flow of a fight and I feel a standing 8 count is just that, as is the mandatory 8 count. If a fighter gets up and wants to fight after 4 seconds then let him.
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,176
    Oct 22, 2006
    I would agree the eight count for Price was futile.

    As for no mandatory 8 count...

    It is the 21st Century, the mandatory eight is a good way for the ref to have a few extra seconds to assess the situation. And for the fighter who has gone down, to compose themselves after being buzzed. So I have no problem with it. But that said, I want a return to 15 round world title fights, so my 'it is the 21st Century' remark does look a bit hypocritical! :oops: