Daniel Geale v Darren Barker - analysis and prediction.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by badlefthook84, Jul 18, 2013.



  1. TCboxa

    TCboxa Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,695
    2
    Feb 13, 2010
    Interesting. When should we know who the judges are for this bout?
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,137
    70,097
    Nov 30, 2006
    Sometimes a week out, but it can be as late as the 24 hour mark (even for world title bouts)
     
  3. TCboxa

    TCboxa Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,695
    2
    Feb 13, 2010
    Do you know if they are random or does Shaw have some pull with who the judges will be?
     
  4. sidthehat

    sidthehat Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,798
    0
    Apr 29, 2008
    Geale outworks him and wins by 4 rounds. Barker will try to line him up for power shots while Geale accumulates comfortable lead.
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,137
    70,097
    Nov 30, 2006
    Assigned by the commission, ostensibly without external influence.

    Carter is a safe bet to occupy a slot, as she is typically there for a few shows per year in A.C. judging anything from mid-card to main event. Incidentally, she gave had Martinez vs. Barker closer than either of her peers...

    Another likely candidate to be tapped for the "local seat" (there is usually one resident on the panel, and then a couple of either international provenance or at least out-of-state) is John Poturaj. His card had Steve Cunningham rightly up over Tyson Fury entering the 7th, and though his 57-55 was closer than my 59-53 it was better than Glenn Feldman's drawn card.
     
  6. TCboxa

    TCboxa Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,695
    2
    Feb 13, 2010
    so far so good then, sounds like Barker will get a fair shake if these two judges are in.
     
  7. Kegsy

    Kegsy Lights Out Full Member

    20,268
    1
    Aug 9, 2006
    I expect at least 1 experienced judge from NY State to be 1 of the 3 judges.
    Have noticed this with many big fights in Jersey.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,137
    70,097
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yeah, either NY or NJ, sometimes one from each.
     
  9. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    8
    Jun 16, 2012
    I kinda fancy Barker in this one, considering the odds. He performed well for long periods vs Martinez and has looked sharp and strong in recent outings (albeit against weaker opposition). Geale is tough and a good all-rounder, but I had his and Strum's fight a draw but thought he didn't do more than Macklin or Murray. I agree that judges will be important in this one and how they see it, because it looks set to be tight.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,137
    70,097
    Nov 30, 2006
    :good
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,109
    4,083
    Jul 19, 2004
    Kind of a 50/50 fight, but I favor Geale slightly. Neither of them would have a chance Vs. Golovkin though...............
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,137
    70,097
    Nov 30, 2006
    Anybody else shocked by this?
     
  13. persianprince

    persianprince Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,889
    119
    Mar 29, 2011
    Geale is underrated, hopefully he'll win a clear decision against Barker. I actually might think that Barker could underestimate Geale a bit :)

    War Geale all the way from Denmark
     
  14. roscoe

    roscoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,861
    0
    Dec 26, 2006
    Geale will win a close UD in this one.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,137
    70,097
    Nov 30, 2006
    I thought you were Persian. :huh


































    :silly