Better Defense: Wlad or Tyson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tyson379, Aug 11, 2013.


  1. nes01

    nes01 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,956
    1
    Jul 24, 2011
    "IF" is your operative word there. You say, "If" he was smaller, he would get Ko-ed. I counter that with an "if" he had an iron chin, then he wouldnt get Ko-ed.

    This is a silly conversation because you cant take away his size or add an iron chin to who he is. This is all fantasy-speak. Wlad is who is he, and he fights according to that, and does a tremendous job.
     
  2. nes01

    nes01 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,956
    1
    Jul 24, 2011
    In every area of life, there are written and unwritten rules. You can't just follow the written ones or you will be disadvantaged; you have to be crafty and manipulate yourself around the fine print of the game. Clinching and leaning are highly effective tricks of the trade, and you cant suddenly deem them 'not real defensive skills'. If it is effective, it is real skills; and Wlad has real skills in abundance.
     
  3. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,177
    26,654
    Jul 21, 2012
    I don't consider bear hugging and groping small guys to death a part of boxing. Its straight up fouling.

    Parrying, ducking , slipping, bob n weaving , side to side latteral movement, counter punching, lighting fast head movement , is what boxing defence is all about.

    To come forward ,slipping shots on the offensive, takes far greater skill than just standing there sticking out the jab in guys faces.

    Any body who says Wlad is a plain dumbass.
     
  4. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    If Tyson was 6'5 would he still be able to bob and weave and slip side to side to avoid punches the way he does at 5'11?
     
  5. uraharakisuke

    uraharakisuke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,518
    0
    Jan 10, 2010
    Wlad has a more effective defense, for a number of reasons.

    Ask yourself; who would you rather be in that ring?

    Wlad barely gets hit.
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,177
    26,654
    Jul 21, 2012
  7. Duke

    Duke New Member Full Member

    88
    0
    Aug 7, 2013
    Ar you serious? Mike Tyson in his prime had a excellent defence, quick and precisly. His height (call it lack of) wat turned in his advantage, the way he fought. Great upperbody movement
     
  8. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    72
    Oct 28, 2004
    Look how many clinches Wladimir initiated against Mormeck in the first round alone.

    :rofl
     
  9. lion

    lion Active Member Full Member

    1,489
    2
    Mar 24, 2007
    wlad has constant grabbing and fouling as a defence. and of course a ring judge that is bribed. that is not a defence, that is illegal and only works in germany.

    tyson was a world known and appreciatede master of the art, wlad is just a hometown hero among russians/ cccr..
    no comparison there
     
  10. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,324
    Nov 18, 2009
    Man, Tyson had the head movement of a fighter at a much lower weight. He had some insane control for a HW.
     
  11. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    473
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson had much better defense in his prime and a solid chin, problem is once Tyson fell in love with his power he abandoned all defense and just rushed into punches to land his own. If hed focused a bit more on his defence he would not have been stopped by Douglas or holyfield