I can imagine her happily scoring it round by round, getting to the end of the fight and then doing some mental arithmetic and thinking 'Oh ****!'
116-112 was bad enough, but 114-114!!! That is a disgrace. You have to think, if the fight was remotely close Mayweather was likely getting robbed.
We were quite correct to be disgusted last week,but some of the comments aimed towards Burns were ludicrous; "He should be ashamed" "He should hand his belt back" I'm guessing Canelo should retire then? People need to start realising that it's no fault of the fighters if the judges are a disgrace. That was a 119-109 for me last night although I'd have no complaints with a 118-110,but is it Canelo's fault CJ is a total fvck up.
Never the fighters fault how a fight is judged that's for sure. But the judge last night not for the first time has come out with a card that a novice watcher of the sport couldn't of come up with. Call her in question how she came up with it & finish the interview with her being told she won't be judging at ringside again.
As long as the right decision was made, It doesn't matter. Burns-Beltran led to a robbery of a decision. Doesn't matter if it's a UD or a SD
Of course it matters, the thick ***** gets allowed to continue to work when she can't do her job properly then someone in the future will be on the end of a robbery.
Are you thick? It only takes another judge to be as incompetent (or on the payrol) to score it the same and that changes the whole thing. In a fight that wide nothing but UD should be said.
Same woman who did Bradley Pac. Needs to be banned. Even amateur boxing doesn't need someone that blind.
