Does Floyd Mayweather jr fight more for Money or Legacy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Florez, Oct 3, 2013.


  1. spoofman

    spoofman New Member Full Member

    28
    0
    Aug 30, 2013
  2. -GhettoWizard-

    -GhettoWizard- Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2013
    money now. hes been a hall of famer since 2006
     
  3. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Money for sure if he really cared about his legacy he would have fought Pac in O9/10. :D
     
  4. puncherschance

    puncherschance Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,818
    241
    Jul 3, 2012
    both he picks and chooses his battles in order to stay undefeated on top of making sure he makes the most money possible.
     
  5. gatorbama

    gatorbama Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,158
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    if you are about to retire why would you try to make the most money as possible. Shane Mosley for example, fought anybody he could. how many people going around talking about his legacy?
     
  6. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    Floyd already said it, health comes first.

    So health > money > legacy.
     
  7. gatorbama

    gatorbama Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,158
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    As it should... Your health should come first in anything.
     
  8. gatorbama

    gatorbama Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,158
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    Ask margarito...the thing that he loved to do, he can no longer do because of his health. Because of that, there goes his money
     
  9. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012
    If he only cared about money, he wouldn't have insisted that Pacquiao undergo strict drug testing. After all, that was the biggest payday out there for him.
     
  10. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,889
    Apr 14, 2009
    ROFL of course it has to be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Floyd screwed up his legacy years ago by ducking dangerous fighters & cherry picking. Really its a shame because with the incredible natural God Given boxing talent he has why wasn't he given the cojones of a champion. Had Floyd not blatantly ducked his dangerous foes , but gone ahead and fought them, he may well still be undefeated. He could today be classed among the best of all time instead of just a very talented wannabee
     
  11. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,880
    Nov 27, 2010
    you can't be serious. Floyd is ALL about the money. He never fought the most dangerous opponents he could have. His legacy is marred.:deal
     
  12. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    definitely damaged
    but his resume is one of the best in boxing

    this is what happens when a fighter becomes bigger than watered down federations
     
  13. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    you really think he's a "wannabee" and not a champion, even though he skipped some big fights?
     
  14. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    the correct answer is a mix of both
     
  15. jonze86

    jonze86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,553
    139
    Sep 14, 2013

    talented wannabee?so jones jr. calzaghe etc.. are just talented wannabees also?

    i hate when people diss fighters so much.floyd is the best fighter of 2000-2013 "modern era" how you can just be a talented wannabee?

    and why you morons think that it's always floyd who ducked someone.
    do you happen to know early 2000's everyone was ducking floyd.too much of risk and not great name.