EASILY Oscar. Easy, easy call. Cotto is a top fighter, dont get me wrong. But Cotto's achievements dont come close to DLH. Achievement's and resume is the only conversation worth having. Not who one prefers.
Oscar ranks higher and I've been a huge Cotto fan for along time, TS is a dumbass... Oscars not an atg, he's overrated? Eat a cawk you clown, stick to tennis or ping pong
I dont think so. I think it's competitive but Oscar beats him clearly. A prime oscar is a different type of animal.
Oscar lost every big fight he was ever in. Except chavez who was finished when they fought. How is he not overrated? Ok if he is an alltime great who ranks a place above abd behind?????
Lost to mosley twice lost to trinidad because he was **** scared to trade. Lost tohopkins lost to mayweather lost to pacman . Im my opinion lost to an accient whitiker. And was beaten by fukin felix strum who is a bum
Okay, bias-alert. It's obvious youre not interested in being a fair boxing observer. You either pick your criteria on official wins, or unofficial wins. If you go by official wins, then you give him Strum and Pernell. If you go by unofficial wins, you give him Trinidad and Mosley II. If you go by flagrant haterism, then you give him nothing. You chose to give him nothing.
Ok mosley could have gone either way. Im not giving him credit for trinidad if anything that is a big reason why he aint an all time great. Had the fight clearly won and ran away . Sturm beat him clearly. Atgs dont lose to fighters on the level of sturm
Come on now, even guys who don't like Oscar (like myself) and like Cotto (like myself) acknowledge in terms of h2h or career comparison, Oscar dwarfs Cotto. It is what it is.....Oscar's a ***** but he was a killer in the ring....(in his prime)
Yes they do. JMM loss to Chris John. Wlad lost to Sanders. Tyson lost to Douglass. The list goes on and on. ATGs not uncommonly do in fact sometimes lose to very average fighters.