Pacquiao's style of pressuring Bradley like an Energizer Bunny was too much for Bradley while 40 year old Marquez's counterpunching style was not effective against a younger and quicker Bradley.
Serious? It was pretty unanimous that Pacquiao comfortably beat Bradley. The Bradley-Marquez fight could have gone either way (for the record I had it 114-114. The international broadcast commentary with Colonel Sheridan and Mario Lopez was atrocious. The colonel had Bradley winning 11 of the 12 rounds!).
I haven't seen the fight, but knowing that many serious posters here actually had Bradley winning this fight then this isn't much of a question. So your question is, who did better? The guy who clearly beat him in a fight or the guy who he beat in a close fight? :think