Many people mistakenly believe it to be Sugar Ray Leonard. Some believe it to be Pernell Whitaker or Floyd Jr. I have repeatedly viewed these great fighters over and over in recent days and have concluded what I've known all along in my gut-that the best pure boxer of our lifetime was Hector Camacho. I don't believe any of the aforementioned fighters could have competed with Hector because they too were boxers by definition, backtrackers if you will. It would take a great attacker with a strong stomach and crushing power such as Roberto Duran to decisively beat him. Other than Duran, there was no boxer who could cope with the blinding speed. How would they compete? It wouldn't be a fair fight because of his umatched hand and footspeed. Pernell found this out in their sparring session when he was rescued by his own cornermen. Floyd jr if he'd fought in Hector's time would become just another anonymity like Greg Coverson. Pernell would pose more of a problem being a fewllow southpaw but even he would be clueless as how to deal with a man who could instantaneously score and then get out of range-it was like trying to fight a ghost. THis is what made Camacho so great and dominant in his time. He is definitely going up higher on my p4p list which is coming soon.
Yet again i will ask for all to see What are Camacho's 5 best wins?!?!??!?!?! Lets get down and sort this out.
Well that's strictly a matter of personal opinion John. SInce he ruled the entire decade of the 1980's anything is fair game. Hector was the fastest gun in the world. Who could have competed with him?
Scared of the question, Rooster? Lets go again, what are your choices for Macho's top 5 wins ever? If there's so many it really can't be hard to rattle off a measley 5.
Pernell Whitaker and Larry Holmes. The best pure boxer over the last 40 years must have a mighty fine jab that he uses often.
I think Edward James Olmos said it best when he compared Hector Camacho with the artist Rembrandt: "Rembrandt must have painted the way Hector Camacho fought. The strokes of the master's brush were probably like slow motion versions of the movements of Hector Camacho's hands during a fight. Watching Camacho fight is like enjoying the subtleties of a great renaissance masterpiece; there's rich color and detail in his performance, his jabs are straight and accurate, his body punches are delivered with care. his left crosses and right hooks are issued with awesome potency". he would go on to say: "Fighting Hector Camacho was much more rigorous than your average champion because the opponent always knew that Hector was fighting for God and Country". I couldnt have said it better myself.
I'll give his top ten a crack. This is based on the opponent's level at the time Hector fought them more than how Hector performed in the fight. 1. Jose Luis Ramirez 2. Edwin Rosario 3. Greg Haugen 4. Cornelius Boza Edwards 5. Vinny Pazienza 6. Howard Davis Jr. 7. Ray Mancini 8 Tony Baltazar 9. Rafael Limon 10. I'm stuck for a number 10... perhaps a Rafael Williams, Greg Richardson, Rafael Solis, Freddie Roach type. That's a pretty good resume on paper, but on a closer analysis it starts to look rather shaky. Limon was totally shot, and the likes of Ray Mancini, Howard Davis and Cornelius Boza Edwards were all past their best days. Mancini (and Boza to a lesser extent) still pushed Camacho fairly close. Amongst the rest, you have fighters like Haugen and Rosario who both went close and arguably beat Camacho. I think his best win, considering the dominance involved, was the Jose Luis Ramirez win. Ramirez was tailor made for Hector, but still it was a very impressive display.